MHB Prove relationship between sets

  • Thread starter Thread starter biocamme
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relationship Sets
biocamme
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
For any two sets A and B prove:

(A∪B)^c=A^c∩B^c
(A∩B)^c=A^c∪B^c
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello biocamme and welcome to MHB! :D

I've edited the title of your thread to be more descriptive of the problem at hand. Also, we ask that our users show their progress (work thus far or thoughts on how to begin) when posting questions. This way our helpers can see where you are stuck or may be going astray and will be able to post the best help possible without potentially making a suggestion which you have already tried, which would waste your time and that of the helper.

Can you post what you have done so far?

A brief description of the notation you are using may be helpful to some.
 
biocamme said:
For any two sets A and B prove:

(A∪B)^c=A^c∩B^c
(A∩B)^c=A^c∪B^c

By using Venn diagram?
 
\text{For any two sets }A\text{ and }B.\:\text{ prove: }\; \begin{array}{cc} (A \cup B)^c\:=\:A^c \cap B^c \\ (A \cap B)^c \:=\:A^c \cup B^c \end{array}
By Venn diagrams? . Truth tables? . Other?

 
A standard method for proving two sets, X and Y, equal is to prove first that X\subseteq Y and then that Y\subseteq X. And to prove X\subseteq Y, start "if x\in X" and then use the properties of X and Y to conclude x\in Y.

Here, if x\in (A\cup B)^c x is not in A\cup B. So x is not in A and x is not in B. Since x is not in A then it is in A^c . Since x is not in B, then it is in B^c so x is in A^c\cap B^c

Now, do the other way- if x is in A^c\cap B^c then it is in both A^c and B^c so x is not in A and not in B. That is, x is not in A\cup B so is in (A\cup B)^c.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top