Prove that G is a p-group iff every element of G has order a power of p

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ibnashraf
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that a finite group \(G\) is a p-group if and only if every element of \(G\) has an order that is a power of a prime \(p\). The definition of a p-group states that every element must have an order of \(p^k\) for some integer \(k\). The proof involves applying Lagrange's theorem, which asserts that the order of any subgroup divides the order of the group. The conversation highlights the necessity of proving both directions of the equivalence, with particular emphasis on the non-trivial part of the proof, which establishes that if every element has order \(p^k\), then the order of the group must also be a power of \(p\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory concepts, specifically p-groups.
  • Familiarity with Lagrange's theorem in group theory.
  • Knowledge of Cauchy's theorem regarding group elements and their orders.
  • Basic mathematical notation and proof techniques in abstract algebra.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Lagrange's theorem in finite group theory.
  • Explore Cauchy's theorem and its applications in proving group properties.
  • Investigate the structure and properties of p-groups in more detail.
  • Review examples of finite groups and their orders to solidify understanding of group classifications.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of abstract algebra, and anyone interested in group theory, particularly those studying the properties and proofs related to p-groups.

ibnashraf
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Question:

"Let G be a finite group. Prove that G is a p-group iff every element of G has order a power of p."

this was my attempt at the question:

Suppose G is a p-group
png.latex
, where
png.latex

Let g
png.latex
png.latex

png.latex

Hence, every element of G has order a power of p.

Conversely, suppose that every element of G has order a power of p
png.latex

But
png.latex

png.latex
divides
png.latex

Hence, G is a p-group.can someone look over this and tell me what mistakes i made if any please ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ibnashraf said:
Question:

"Let G be a finite group. Prove that G is a p-group iff every element of G has order a power of p."

this was my attempt at the question:

Suppose G is a p-group
png.latex
, where
png.latex

Let g
png.latex
png.latex

png.latex

Hence, every element of G has order a power of p.

Conversely, suppose that every element of G has order a power of p
png.latex

But
png.latex

png.latex
divides
png.latex

Hence, G is a p-group.can someone look over this and tell me what mistakes i made if any please ?

Hi ibnashraf, :)

The definition of a p-group is,

Given a prime \(p\), a \(\mbox{p-group}\) is a group in which every element has order \(p^k\) for some \(k\in\mathbb{Z}\cup\{0\}\).

The statement that is to be "proved" is in fact the definition of a p-group.

Kind Regards,
Sudharaka.
 
Sudharaka said:
Hi ibnashraf, :)

The definition of a p-group is,

Given a prime \(p\), a \(\mbox{p-group}\) is a group in which every element has order \(p^k\) for some \(k\in\mathbb{Z}\cup\{0\}\).

The statement that is to be "proved" is in fact the definition of a p-group.

Kind Regards,
Sudharaka.

I presume the definition of $p$-group the OP has is "$G$ is a $p$-group if the order of $G$ is $p^n$ for some prime $p$". Then the result follows from Lagrange's theorem, which says that if $H$ is a subgroup of $G$ then $|H|$ divides $|G|=p^n$. If $g\in G$ then the set $\{g, g^2, \ldots, g^m=1\}$ where $m$ is the order of $g$ has $m$ elements. It is also a subgroup of $G$. Thus, $m$ divides $G$ and so is a prime power, and we are done.
 
but you have only proved half of what needs to be proved:

|G| = pn → if g is in G, then |g| = pk, for some 0 ≤ k ≤ n.

that is the "trivial" part. the other part:

(for all g in G: |g| = pk for some k ≥ 0) → |G| = p​n, for some n in N, is far less trivial (and the OP's "proof" is entirely erroneous).

what we DO know, from a corollary to Lagrange, is that |G| = mpn.

without loss of generality, we may assume p does not divide m.

let q be a prime dividing m. by Cauchy's theorem, G has an element of order q. but this contradictions our assumptions on G. thus there can BE no such prime q.

but the only positive integer m that has no prime divisors is 1, and NOW we're done.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
937
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
910
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K