MHB Prove this fibonacci sequence w/o binet formula

  • Thread starter Thread starter skate_nerd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula Sequence
skate_nerd
Messages
174
Reaction score
0
I have a problem and honestly have no idea even where to start. I've been staring at it and thinking about it for over 24 hours...
Let \(u_n\) denote the \(n^{th}\) Fibonacci number. Without using the Binet formula for \(u_n\), prove the following for all natural numbers \(m\) and \(n\) with \(m\geq{2}\):
$$u_{m+n}=u_{m-1}u_n+u_mu_{n+1}$$

I have gone through a couple proofs regarding the Fibonacci numbers in this class before, but never one with two unknowns, and also never one where we weren't able to use the Binet formula. Without the Binet formula, what do I have to work off of? Do I need to write the derivation for the Binet formula within this whole proof?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Try induction on $n$.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Back
Top