Elliptic functions proof -- convergence series on lattice

binbagsss
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement


Hi

I am looking at the proof attached for the theorem attached that:

If ##s \in R##, then ##\sum'_{w\in\Omega} |w|^-s ## converges iff ##s > 2##
where ##\Omega \in C## is a lattice with basis ##{w_1,w_2}##.

For any integer ##r \geq 0 ## :

##\Omega_r := {mw_1+nw_2|m,n \in Z, max {|m|,|n|}=r} ##
##\Pi_r := {mw_1+nw_2|m,n \in Z, max {|m|,|n|}=r} ##

so that ##\Omega = {0} \Cup \Omega_1 \Cup \Omega_2 \Cup...##

Each ##\Omega_r## has cardinality ##8r##

QUESTIONS
- To prove via the comparison test, we only need to bound from above by a series that converges, so why have we bound from above and below - this is my main question really, why have we bound from above and below
- Does this proove via both the convergence test and the Weierstass-M test? Since each term in the sequence ##|w|^{-s}## is bound above by a real constant.
- The definition of the W-M test is ##u_n## a seqence of functions, if for each a ##n \in N## there exists ##M_n \in R## satisfying ##|u_n(z)|\leq M_n ## got all ##z \in E## where ##u_n : E \to C## and ##\sum M_n## converges. Here the '##u_n##' are ##|w|## are already taken the absolute value, does this change anything here or the W-M test or does it still apply in the same way?

Many thanks in advance.

Homework Equations


as above

The Attempt at a Solution


as above
 

Attachments

  • w s greater 2.png
    w s greater 2.png
    17.7 KB · Views: 480
Physics news on Phys.org
bump.many thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K