Prove $x>2y$ Given $e^y=\dfrac{x}{1-e^{-x}}$

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the inequality $x>2y$ given the relationship $e^y=\dfrac{x}{1-e^{-x}}$. Participants explore various mathematical approaches, including logarithmic manipulation, calculus, and series expansion, to establish the inequality.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses an initial attempt to express $y$ in terms of $x$ and reformulates the problem to show that proving $\dfrac{x}{2}+\ln x- \ln (e^x-1)<0$ would suffice to establish the inequality.
  • Another participant suggests demonstrating that $\sinh\left(\frac{x}{2}\right)>\frac{x}{2}$ as a means to prove the original inequality.
  • A different approach involves manipulating the inequality to show that $e^x>\frac{x^2e^{2x}}{(e^x-1)^2}$, leading to the conclusion that $\sinh\left(\frac{x}{2}\right)>\frac{x}{2}$.
  • One participant proposes using the McLaurin expansion around $x=0$ for the logarithmic function to analyze the behavior of $y$, suggesting that $y(x) \le \frac{x}{2}$.
  • Another participant acknowledges the utility of the McLaurin expansion and expresses interest in exploring simpler methods to solve the problem.
  • There is mention of using the mean value theorem as an alternative solution approach.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present multiple competing views and approaches to the problem, with no consensus reached on a single method or solution. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the most effective strategy to prove the inequality.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the complexity of applying inequality theorems to the expressions involved, and there are references to the limitations of certain methods, such as the McLaurin expansion, in providing a definitive proof.

anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Hi MHB,

Problem:

Assume $x>0$, and $y$ satisfy that $e^y=\dfrac{x}{1-e^{-x}}$, prove that $x>2y$.

Attempt:

I first tried to express $y$ in terms of $x$ and get:

$y=x+\ln x- \ln (e^x-1)$

and I am aware that one of the method to prove the intended result is to rewrite the equation above as

$y-\dfrac{x}{2}=\dfrac{x}{2}+\ln x- \ln (e^x-1)$

and if I can prove $\dfrac{x}{2}+\ln x- \ln (e^x-1)<0$, which also implies $y-\dfrac{x}{2}<0$, then the result is proved.

Now, I see it that no inequality theorems that I know of could be applied to the expression $\dfrac{x}{2}+\ln x- \ln (e^x-1)$ and hence I get stuck, so stuck that I wish to drop this problem behind my mind!

But, I hope to solve it nonetheless and that's why I posted it here and hope someone can chime into help me out.

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Re: Prove x>2y

Can you show that the given definition of $y$ and the inequality implies:

$$\sinh\left(\frac{x}{2} \right)>\frac{x}{2}$$ ?

After that, a bit of calculus is all you need to demonstrate this is true. :D
 
Re: Prove x>2y

MarkFL said:
Can you show that the given definition of $y$ and the inequality implies:

$$\sinh\left(\frac{x}{2} \right)>\frac{x}{2}$$ ?

We can simplify the terms of natural logarithm in $\dfrac{x}{2}+\ln x- \ln (e^x-1)$ and get:

$\dfrac{x}{2}+\ln x- \ln (e^x-1)=\dfrac{x}{2}+\ln \dfrac{x}{e^x-1}$

and to be honest with you, I don't understand how to get what you obtained.
 
Re: Prove x>2y

I began with the given inequality:

$$x>2y$$

and this implies:

$$e^x>e^{2y}=\left(e^y \right)^2=\left(\frac{x}{1-e^{-x}} \right)^2=\left(\frac{xe^x}{e^x-1} \right)^2$$

Hence:

$$e^x>\frac{x^2e^{2x}}{\left(e^x-1 \right)^2}$$

Multiplying through by $$\frac{\left(e^x-1 \right)^2}{e^{2x}}>0$$ we obtain:

$$e^{-x}\left(e^x-1 \right)^2>x^2$$

Now this implies:

$$e^{-\frac{x}{2}}\left(e^x-1 \right)>x$$

$$e^{\frac{x}{2}}-e^{-\frac{x}{2}}>x$$

Dividing through by 2:

$$\frac{e^{\frac{x}{2}}-e^{-\frac{x}{2}}}{2}>\frac{x}{2}$$

Using the definition of the hyperbolic sine function, we may now write:

$$\sinh\left(\frac{x}{2} \right)>\frac{x}{2}$$
 
Re: Prove x>2y

Ah, I see...thanks!
 
Re: Prove x>2y

anemone said:
Hi MHB,

Problem:

Assume $x>0$, and $y$ satisfy that $e^y=\dfrac{x}{1-e^{-x}}$, prove that $x>2y$.

Attempt:

I first tried to express $y$ in terms of $x$ and get:

$y=x+\ln x- \ln (e^x-1)$

and I am aware that one of the method to prove the intended result is to rewrite the equation above as

$y-\dfrac{x}{2}=\dfrac{x}{2}+\ln x- \ln (e^x-1)$

and if I can prove $\dfrac{x}{2}+\ln x- \ln (e^x-1)<0$, which also implies $y-\dfrac{x}{2}<0$, then the result is proved.

Now, I see it that no inequality theorems that I know of could be applied to the expression $\dfrac{x}{2}+\ln x- \ln (e^x-1)$ and hence I get stuck, so stuck that I wish to drop this problem behind my mind!

But, I hope to solve it nonetheless and that's why I posted it here and hope someone can chime into help me out.

Thanks in advance.

I'm afraid that You have to try the McLaurin expansion around x = 0 of the logarhitm of the function... $\displaystyle y = \ln x - \ln (1 - e^{-x})\ (1)$Starting from f(0) and using l'Hopital rule You have... $\displaystyle \lim_{x \rightarrow 0} \frac{x}{1 - e^{-x}} = \lim_{x \rightarrow 0} e^{x} = 1 \implies y(0) = 0\ (2)$

The procedure for the derivatives however is much more complex and 'Monster Wolfram' can supply a significative aid...

ln x - ln [1 - e^(- x)] - Wolfram|Alpha

The McLaurin expansion we are interersted for is...

$\displaystyle y(x) = \frac{x}{2} - \frac{x^{2}}{24} + \frac{x^{4}}{2880} + \mathcal {O} (x^{6})\ (3)$

As curiosity y(x) is defined for all value of x [positive as well as negatives...] and is $y(x) \le \frac{x}{2}$. May be that a simpler approach to the problem exists and, if yes, it must be found... Kind regards $\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Re: Prove x>2y

chisigma said:
I'm afraid that You have to try the McLaurin expansion around x = 0 of the logarhitm of the function... $\displaystyle y = \ln x - \ln (1 - e^{-x})\ (1)$Starting from f(0) and using l'Hopital rule You have... $\displaystyle \lim_{x \rightarrow 0} \frac{x}{1 - e^{-x}} = \lim_{x \rightarrow 0} e^{x} = 1 \implies y(0) = 0\ (2)$

The procedure for the derivatives however is much more complex and 'Monster Wolfram' can supply a significative aid...

ln x - ln [1 - e^(- x)] - Wolfram|Alpha

The McLaurin expansion we are interersted for is...

$\displaystyle y(x) = \frac{x}{2} - \frac{x^{2}}{24} + \frac{x^{4}}{2880} + \mathcal {O} (x^{6})\ (3)$

As curiosity y(x) is defined for all value of x [positive as well as negatives...] and is $y(x) \le \frac{x}{2}$.

Hey chisigma, thank you for your reply...and I am happy to learn these two methods to solve the problem!

chisigma said:
May be that a simpler approach to the problem exists and, if yes, it must be found...

I think MarkFL's approach is very straightforward and smart! :):o
 
Re: Prove x>2y

Here's another solution which just uses a careful application of the mean value theorem.

View attachment 1617
 

Attachments

  • MHBcalculus3.png
    MHBcalculus3.png
    8.4 KB · Views: 122

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K