Proving a Function is OntoIs f: ZxZ->Z an onto function?

  • Thread starter Thread starter alman9898
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The function f: ZxZ->Z defined by f(m, n) = 2m - n is proven to be onto, as for every integer y, there exists at least one integer pair (m, n) such that f(m, n) = y. The proof demonstrates that if y is even, setting n = 0 yields m = y/2, and if y is odd, setting n = 1 yields m = (y + 1)/2. Other functions discussed, such as f(m, n) = n^2 - m^2 and f(m, n) = m^2 - 4, are shown not to be onto due to restrictions on the range of outputs. The discussion emphasizes the necessity of finding integer solutions for each case to establish onto properties.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of functions and their properties, specifically onto functions.
  • Familiarity with integer arithmetic and properties of even and odd integers.
  • Basic knowledge of algebraic manipulation and solving equations.
  • Experience with mathematical proofs and logical reasoning.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the definition and properties of onto functions in more detail.
  • Explore proofs involving integer solutions and their implications in number theory.
  • Learn about other types of functions, such as one-to-one and bijective functions.
  • Investigate the implications of function ranges and codomains in mathematical analysis.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying algebra, mathematicians interested in function properties, and educators teaching concepts of onto functions and integer solutions.

alman9898
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Determine whether f: ZxZ->Z is onto if

(a) f(m, n) = 2m-n
(b) f(m, n) = n^2 - m^2
(c) f(m, n) = m + n + 1
(d) f(m, n) = |m| - |n|
(e) f(m, n) = m^2 - 4

Homework Equations



A function is onto if for every y in the codomain there is at least one X in the domain st f(x) = y

The Attempt at a Solution



I have no idea how to start proving this. I know I'm supposed to prove that for every integer y, there is at least 1 (m, n) pair, but that requires solving for another variable m or n doesn't it? This leaves a lot of m,n to test for yes?

For example, I can go about the first one by setting m = (y+n)/2 and if y = 0 and n is odd then m is not an integer. However, I know from reading ahead that the first one is onto.

For the last one I can do

sqrt(y+4) = m
If y = 1, then m is not an integer and so y = 1 is not in the range

Am I supposed to prove the cases where m is odd, n is even, both are even, both are odd, m is even, n is odd?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
find what the range is. Clearly, it is the set of integers. Thus for every integer a, we should have f(x, y) = a

for the first part 2m - n = a => 2m = a + n. Since m and n are also integers. find how many such pairs satisfy. In fact, don't find all pairs, just prove that atleast one answer exists...

Remember, that a is an integer and can be negative
 
Heres a try at the first one

m = (a+n)/2 is an integer only if m is even which => (a+n) must be even.

(a+n) is even if a & n are both even or both odd which covers a for both even and odd integers
 
alman9898 said:
Heres a try at the first one

m = (a+n)/2 is an integer only if m is even which => (a+n) must be even.

(a+n) is even if a & n are both even or both odd which covers a for both even and odd integers

ok, why should m be even? a + n should be even, because it is being divided by two, and the result must be an integer. However, m need not be.

9 = (11 + 7)/2
 
alman9898 said:
Heres a try at the first one

m = (a+n)/2 is an integer only if m is even which => (a+n) must be even.

(a+n) is even if a & n are both even or both odd which covers a for both even and odd integers

No, m does not have to be even, only a+ n does.

For a any integer, 2m-n= a implies m= (a+n)/2. Okay, if a is even, say a= 2k, take n= 0 so m= a/2= k: 2k- 0= 2k= a. If a is odd, say a= 2k+1, take n= 1 so m= (2k+ 2)/2= k+1; 2(k+1)- 1= 2k+ 2- 1= 2k+ 1= a. For any a, there exist m and n such that 2m- n= a. The function is "onto" Z.

(Note: this function is not "one to one". f(3,5)= 2(3)- 5= 1 and f(2, 3)= 2(2)- 3= 1.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K