Proving Boolean Lattice Complementarity in [a,b]

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Aryth1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lattice
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that the interval $[a,b]$ in a Boolean lattice $L$ is a Boolean lattice itself under the inherited partial ordering. The focus is on demonstrating that $[a,b]$ is complemented, following the establishment that it is a sublattice and distributive.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant outlines the problem of proving that $[a,b]$ is a Boolean lattice and describes their progress in showing it is a sublattice and distributive.
  • The same participant expresses difficulty in demonstrating that the complement of an element $x \in [a,b]$ also lies within $[a,b]$.
  • Another participant suggests that the original poster could share their solution for the benefit of others.
  • The original poster later claims to have found a solution, proposing that the complement of $x$ in $[a,b]$ can be expressed as $z = (y\vee a)\wedge b$, where $y$ is the complement of $x$ in $L$.
  • The original poster provides a verification of their proposed complement $z$ by showing it satisfies the conditions for being a complement in $[a,b]$.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not express disagreement, but the discussion reflects a progression from uncertainty to a proposed solution without explicit consensus on the correctness of the final claim.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not address potential limitations or assumptions that may affect the proof, nor does it clarify the definitions of complementarity in the context of Boolean lattices.

Aryth1
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
The problem is this:

Let $L$ be a Boolean lattice. For all $a<b\in L$, prove that the interval $[a,b] = \uparrow a \cap \downarrow b$ is a Boolean lattice under the partial ordering inherited from $L$.

What I've managed to do so far:

I used the fact that $[a,b]$ was a poset and showed that, for any $x,y\in [a,b]$, $x\vee y\in [a,b]$ and $x\wedge y\in [a,b]$ which proved that $[a,b]$ was a sublattice of $L$. From this we get that $[a,b]$ is distributive for free, since if $L$ had a sublattice that wasn't distributive, then $L$ would not be distributive. All that remains is to show that $[a,b]$ is complemented. I cannot seem to figure this out. I know that, if we take some $x\in [a,b]$ then a complement exists in $L$ since $L$ is a Boolean lattice, but I don't know how to show that that complement is in $[a,b]$ also.

Any hints would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nevermind, I figured it out. Close or delete if you like.
 
Aryth said:
Nevermind, I figured it out. Close or delete if you like.

If you want, and it is entirely up to you, you could post your solution for the benefit of others who might gain from your solution. :D
 
MarkFL said:
If you want, and it is entirely up to you, you could post your solution for the benefit of others who might gain from your solution. :D

Ah, OK then.

I'll limit the problem to proving that $[a,b]$ is complemented.

Let $x\in [a,b]$. Then, since $L$ is a Boolean lattice, $x$ has a complement in $L$, call it $y$. We claim that the complement of $x$ in $[a,b]$ is $z = (y\vee a)\wedge b$. To see this, observe that:
$x\wedge z = x\wedge (y\vee a)\wedge b = [(x\wedge y)\vee (x\wedge a)]\wedge b = (\bot\vee a)\wedge b = a$​
Similarly, $x\vee z = b$ and $z$ suffices as a complement for $x$ in $[a,b]$. Since $x$ was arbitrary, $[a,b]$ is complemented.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K