Proving Boolean Lattice Complementarity in [a,b]

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Aryth1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lattice
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that the interval $[a,b] = \uparrow a \cap \downarrow b$ within a Boolean lattice $L$ is itself a Boolean lattice. The user demonstrated that $[a,b]$ is a sublattice of $L$ by showing that for any $x,y \in [a,b]$, both $x \vee y$ and $x \wedge y$ are contained in $[a,b]$. The final proof established that $[a,b]$ is complemented by defining the complement of an element $x \in [a,b]$ as $z = (y \vee a) \wedge b$, where $y$ is the complement of $x$ in $L$. This confirms that $[a,b]$ satisfies the properties of a Boolean lattice.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Boolean lattices and their properties
  • Familiarity with partial ordering and posets
  • Knowledge of lattice operations such as join ($\vee$) and meet ($\wedge$)
  • Experience with mathematical proofs and complementarity in lattices
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Boolean lattices in depth
  • Learn about the structure and characteristics of posets
  • Explore advanced topics in lattice theory, including distributive lattices
  • Investigate applications of Boolean lattices in computer science and logic
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, computer scientists, and students studying lattice theory, particularly those interested in the properties and applications of Boolean lattices.

Aryth1
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
The problem is this:

Let $L$ be a Boolean lattice. For all $a<b\in L$, prove that the interval $[a,b] = \uparrow a \cap \downarrow b$ is a Boolean lattice under the partial ordering inherited from $L$.

What I've managed to do so far:

I used the fact that $[a,b]$ was a poset and showed that, for any $x,y\in [a,b]$, $x\vee y\in [a,b]$ and $x\wedge y\in [a,b]$ which proved that $[a,b]$ was a sublattice of $L$. From this we get that $[a,b]$ is distributive for free, since if $L$ had a sublattice that wasn't distributive, then $L$ would not be distributive. All that remains is to show that $[a,b]$ is complemented. I cannot seem to figure this out. I know that, if we take some $x\in [a,b]$ then a complement exists in $L$ since $L$ is a Boolean lattice, but I don't know how to show that that complement is in $[a,b]$ also.

Any hints would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nevermind, I figured it out. Close or delete if you like.
 
Aryth said:
Nevermind, I figured it out. Close or delete if you like.

If you want, and it is entirely up to you, you could post your solution for the benefit of others who might gain from your solution. :D
 
MarkFL said:
If you want, and it is entirely up to you, you could post your solution for the benefit of others who might gain from your solution. :D

Ah, OK then.

I'll limit the problem to proving that $[a,b]$ is complemented.

Let $x\in [a,b]$. Then, since $L$ is a Boolean lattice, $x$ has a complement in $L$, call it $y$. We claim that the complement of $x$ in $[a,b]$ is $z = (y\vee a)\wedge b$. To see this, observe that:
$x\wedge z = x\wedge (y\vee a)\wedge b = [(x\wedge y)\vee (x\wedge a)]\wedge b = (\bot\vee a)\wedge b = a$​
Similarly, $x\vee z = b$ and $z$ suffices as a complement for $x$ in $[a,b]$. Since $x$ was arbitrary, $[a,b]$ is complemented.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K