Proving Properties of Lattices: How to Use DeMorgan's Laws

  • Topic:
  • Thread starter Thread starter Aryth1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lattice
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
2 replies · 2K views
Aryth1
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
My problem is this:

Let $L$ be a bounded, complemented, distributive lattice and let $x,y,z\in L$. Prove the following:

1. $x\wedge y = \bot \Leftrightarrow x\leq y^c$
2. $x = (x^c)^c$
3. $x\wedge y \leq z \Leftrightarrow y\leq x^c \vee z$
4. $(x\vee y)^c = x^c \wedge y^c$
5. $(x\wedge y)^c = x^c \vee y^c$

The first two I have finished, and the last two are basically DeMorgan's laws. I'm having some trouble with #3. Any help is appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here is one direction of 3:

$y \leq (x^c \vee z) \iff y = y \wedge (x^c \vee z)$

Thus:

$x \wedge y = x \wedge [y \wedge (x^c \vee z)]$

$= x \wedge [(y \wedge x^c) \vee (y \wedge z)]$ (distributive law)

$= [x \wedge (y \wedge x^c) ] \vee [x \wedge (y \wedge z)]$ (distributive law, again)

$ = [x \wedge (x^c \wedge y)] \vee [x \wedge (y \wedge z)]$ (commutativity)

$ = [(x \wedge x^c) \wedge y] \vee [x \wedge (y \wedge z)]$ (associativity)

$ = [0 \wedge y] \vee [x \wedge (y \wedge z)]$ (complement law)

$ = 0 \vee [x \wedge (y \wedge z)]$ (zero law? forget what this is called)

$= x \wedge (y \wedge z)$ (identity law)

$= (x \wedge y) \wedge z$ (associativity)

which shows that $x \wedge y = (x \wedge y) \wedge z$, that is:

$x \wedge y \leq z$

Ask yourself, are these steps reversible?
 
Deveno said:
Here is one direction of 3:

$y \leq (x^c \vee z) \iff y = y \wedge (x^c \vee z)$

Thus:

$x \wedge y = x \wedge [y \wedge (x^c \vee z)]$

$= x \wedge [(y \wedge x^c) \vee (y \wedge z)]$ (distributive law)

$= [x \wedge (y \wedge x^c) ] \vee [x \wedge (y \wedge z)]$ (distributive law, again)

$ = [x \wedge (x^c \wedge y)] \vee [x \wedge (y \wedge z)]$ (commutativity)

$ = [(x \wedge x^c) \wedge y] \vee [x \wedge (y \wedge z)]$ (associativity)

$ = [0 \wedge y] \vee [x \wedge (y \wedge z)]$ (complement law)

$ = 0 \vee [x \wedge (y \wedge z)]$ (zero law? forget what this is called)

$= x \wedge (y \wedge z)$ (identity law)

$= (x \wedge y) \wedge z$ (associativity)

which shows that $x \wedge y = (x \wedge y) \wedge z$, that is:

$x \wedge y \leq z$

Ask yourself, are these steps reversible?

Thanks a lot for your help! I hadn't thought about your first $\iff$. That was what I was missing. I'm learning this on my own with monthly meetings with a professor, so sometimes I don't manage to see simple things. Thank you!