MHB Proving $\dfrac{(n-1)^{2n-2}}{(n-2)^{n-2}}<n^n$ for $n\ge 3$

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Prove that $\dfrac{(n-1)^{2n-2}}{(n-2)^{n-2}}<n^n$ for integer $n\ge 3$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Recall Bernoulli's inequality, $(1+x)^t>1+tx$ when $x>-1,\,x\ne 0$ and $t\ge 1$. For $m>1$, we have

$\begin{align*}\left(\dfrac{m+1}{m}\right)^{m+1}\left(\dfrac{m-1}{m}\right)^{m-1}&=\left(1+\dfrac{1}{m}\right)^2\left(1-\dfrac{1}{m^2}\right)^{m-1}\\& >\left(1+\dfrac{1}{m}\right)^2\left(1-\dfrac{m-1}{m^2}\right)\\&=\left(\dfrac{m^3+1}{m^3}\right)\left(\dfrac{m+1}{m}\right)\\& >1\end{align*}$

Hence, $(m+1)^{m+1}>m^{2m}(m-1)^{-(m-1)}$. Setting $m=n-1$ yields the desired result.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top