MHB Proving Divisibility: Does a^n Divide b^n Imply a Divides b?

  • Thread starter Thread starter evinda
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving that if \( a^n \) divides \( b^n \), then \( a \) must divide \( b \). The initial approach involves expressing \( a \) and \( b \) in terms of their greatest common divisor \( d \) and coprime factors \( a_1 \) and \( b_1 \). The conclusion drawn is that since \( (a_1, b_1) = 1 \), it follows that \( a_1 \) divides \( b_1 \), leading to the assertion that \( a \) divides \( b \). However, there is a clarification needed regarding the implications of \( d \cdot b_1 = l \cdot d \cdot a_1 \), which does not imply \( b \) divides \( a \). Ultimately, the solution confirms that \( a \mid b \) is indeed correct.
evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hey! (Wave)

I am looking at the following exercise:

Show that $a^n \mid b^n \Rightarrow a \mid b$.

According to my notes,it is like that:

Let $a^n \mid b^n$.

Let $d=(a,b)$

Then, $a=d \cdot a_1 \\ b=d \cdot b_1$

$$(a_1,b_1)=1$$

$$b^n=k \cdot a^n, \text{ for a } k \in \mathbb{Z}$$

$$d^n \cdot b_1^n=k \cdot d^n \cdot a_1^n \Rightarrow b_1^n=k \cdot a_1^n$$

Therefore, $$ a_1 \mid b_1^n=\underset{n}{\underbrace{b_1 \cdot b_1 \cdots b_1}} \overset{(a_1,b_1)=1}{\Rightarrow} a_1 \mid \underset{n-1}{\underbrace{b_1 \cdot b_1 \cdots b_1}} \Rightarrow a_1 \mid \underset{n-2}{\underbrace{b_1 \cdot b_1 \cdots b_1}} \Rightarrow a_1 \mid b_1$$

So,we conclude that $b_1=l \cdot a_1, l \in \mathbb{Z}$

$$d \cdot b_1=l \cdot d \cdot a_1 \Rightarrow b \mid a \Rightarrow a \mid b$$

But...is it right?? (Thinking) We show that $(a_1,b_1)=1$ and then we conclude that $a_1 \mid b_1$... (Wasntme) :confused:
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
evinda said:
But...is it right?? (Thinking) We show that $(a_1,b_1)=1$ and then we conclude that $a_1 \mid b_1$... (Wasntme) :confused:

Hi! (Happy)

Then that must mean that $a_1=1$ doesn't it? (Thinking)
 
I like Serena said:
Hi! (Happy)

Then that must mean that $a_1=1$ doesn't it? (Thinking)

Oh,yes! (Nod) So,the solution is right,or not?? (Thinking)
 
evinda said:
$$d \cdot b_1=l \cdot d \cdot a_1 \Rightarrow b \mid a \Rightarrow a \mid b$$

evinda said:
Oh,yes! (Nod) So,the solution is right,or not?? (Thinking)

Almost.
But from $d \cdot b_1=l \cdot d \cdot a_1$ we cannot conclude that $b \mid a$. (Doh)
It's a good thing we can conclude that $a \mid b$! (Mmm)
 
I like Serena said:
Almost.
But from $d \cdot b_1=l \cdot d \cdot a_1$ we cannot conclude that $b \mid a$. (Doh)
It's a good thing we can conclude that $a \mid b$! (Mmm)

Oh,sorry! (Blush)(Blush) I accidentally wrote it like that.I wanted to write:

$$d \cdot b_1=l \cdot d \cdot a_1 \Rightarrow b=l \cdot a \Rightarrow a \mid b$$

Thank you very much! (Smile)
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
22K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K