Proving Equality of Subspace Topologies: A Topological Lemma Approach

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter MathematicalPhysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Subspace Topology
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the equality of subspace topologies, specifically showing that if Y is a subspace of X and A is a subset of Y, then the subspace topology on A as a subspace of Y is the same as the subspace topology on A as a subspace of X. The scope includes theoretical aspects of topology and mathematical reasoning.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant outlines the definitions of the topologies involved and begins a proof, expressing uncertainty about applying a lemma regarding open sets.
  • Another participant provides a proof showing that if O is open in the topology induced from Y, it is also open in the topology induced from X, and vice versa, concluding that the topologies coincide.
  • A participant questions the assumption that an open set in Y can be expressed as an intersection with an open set in X, suggesting that the reasoning may not hold universally.
  • Another participant clarifies the relationship between open sets in the subspace topology and the topologies on Y and X, emphasizing the definition of subspace topology.
  • One participant expresses confusion about the implications of the subspace topology and whether a set can have multiple topologies.
  • A later reply confirms that the topology on Y is indeed the subspace topology it inherits from X, acknowledging the previous points made in the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is some agreement on the definitions and implications of subspace topologies, but there remains disagreement and confusion regarding the application of certain assumptions and the validity of specific claims about open sets.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the application of lemmas and the assumptions underlying the definitions of topologies, indicating that the discussion may depend on specific interpretations of open sets and their relationships.

MathematicalPhysicist
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,662
Reaction score
372
Well it's not homewrok cause i don't need to hand this question in, this is why i decided to put it here. (that, and there isn't a topology forum per se, perhaps it's suited to point set topology so the set theory forum may suit it).

Now to the question:
Show that if Y is a subspace of X, and A is a subset of Y, then the subspace topoology on A as a subspace of Y is the same as the subspace topology on A as a subspace of X.
(^-stands for intersection).
well so i wrote the specific topologies in hand:
T is a topology on X and T' a topology on Y.
T_Y subspace topology on Y from T, i.e: [tex]T_Y[/tex]={ Y^U|U\in T }
[tex]T_{A_Y}[/tex]={ A^U|U\in T' } is the subspace topology on A as a subspace of Y, and [tex]T_{A_X}[/tex]={ A^U| U\in T }
is the subspace on A as a subspace of X, now i need to prove that the latter topologies are the same, i.e are equal.
and so iv'e begun:
let V be in T_{A_Y} then there exists U in T' such that V=A^U but A is a subset of Y, then V is a subset of Y^U, so because Y and U are in T', also Y^U in T', now i need to prove that U is in T (the topology of X), now there's a lemma that ithink i need to use here but not certain how to apply it, the lemma states that:
Let Y be a subspace of X, if U is open in Y and Y is open in X then U is open in X.
now i obvioulsy want to show that U is open in X, so i need Y to be open in X, not sure how to do it, any hints?
p.s
also hints for the second part of the proof would be nice but i haven't yet tried to prove the second part.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
loop quantum gravity said:
Show that if Y is a subspace of X, and A is a subset of Y, then the subspace topoology on A as a subspace of Y is the same as the subspace topology on A as a subspace of X.

Suppose O is open in the topology on A induced from Y. Then 0 = A n V for some V open in Y. Since V is open Y we have V = Y n B for some B open in X. Then 0 = A n V = A n Y n B = A n B because A is a subset of Y , hence O is open in the topology induced on A from X.

Conversely, suppose O is open in the subspace topology on A induced from X. Then O = A n B for some open B in X. Since A is a subset of Y, O = A n B = A n (Y n B) and Y n B is open in Y since B is open in X. Thus O is open in the topology induced on A from Y.

So the open sets in the topology induced on A from Y are exactly the same as the open sets in the topology induced on A from X. So these topologies coincide.

Notice two things. I didn't use any theorems, only what it means to be open in each respective topology, and, I didn't introduce any symbols for the topologies, which makes things easier and cleaner imho. Hope this helps.
 
Last edited:
I don't quite understand.
why because V is open in Y we have V=YnB for some B open in X, the fact that it's open in the subspace topology means that it's open in every other topology on Y, cause i think that this is what is assumed here, cause the above assertion is valid when V is in T_Y although from our assumption it's in T'.
 
U is open in the subspace A of Y
iff U=A[itex]\cap[/itex]V where V is open in the subspace Y of X
iff U=A[itex]\cap[/itex](Y[itex]\cap[/itex]G)=A[itex]\cap[/itex]G where G is open in X (the second equality holds because A[itex]\cap[/itex]Y=A).
 
Last edited:
OK morphism repeating it doesn't explain it.

as I said U is in T_A_Y iff there exists V in T' such that U=AnV where T' is the topology on Y, the definition of subspace topology is quite clear every intersection of an open set in the topology on Y with A is in this topology.
now, if V is in T' does it means that it's in T_Y?
I mean does a set has only one topology on it ( i think not).
 
It's stated that the topology on Y is the subspace topology it gets from X...
 
you mean that by saying Y is a subspace of X, it's actually saying that the subspace topology is the topology on Y.
yes, I see your point, thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K