Proving Force on Arbitrary Wire Same as Straight Wire

  • Thread starter Thread starter stunner5000pt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Wire
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 3K views
stunner5000pt
Messages
1,447
Reaction score
5
The figure shows a wire of arbitrary shape carrying a current i between points a and b. The wire lies in a plane at right angles to a uniform magnetic field B. Prove that the force on the wire is the same as that on a straight wire carrying a current i directly from a to b. (Hint: Replace the wire by a series of "steps" that are parllel and perpendicular to the straight line jkoining a and b.)
WEll umm
well the force on the stirahgt wire from a to b is simply
[tex]F = iL \cross B = iLB \sin( \theta)[/tex]
for the arbitrary wire
[tex]F = \int idL \cross B[/tex]
but i is constant and B is constant so
[tex]F = iB \int dL = iBL[/tex] whicvh is the same as the stariaght wire. Is this correct?
 

Attachments

  • charge.JPG
    charge.JPG
    7.3 KB · Views: 470
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
See my reply to your other post. What is the integral
[tex] \int d\vec{\ell}[/tex]
along the curvy wire from [tex]\vec{a}[/tex] to [tex]\vec{b}[/tex]? Does the integral depend on path? Why?
 
The only reason i can think of an integral not depending on path is because a force is conservative. But why is the force due to a magnetic field conservative? Is it because the energy reamins constant in this system?
 
You are integrating a differential, what does that tell you about the result of the integration? If you are uncomfortable with this argument and want to be a bit more formal, then try using the fundamental theorem of line integrals on the integral
[tex] \int_C \vec{v}\cdot d\vec{\ell} = \vec{v} \cdot \int_C d\vec{\ell}[/tex]
where [tex]\vec{v}[/tex] is an arbitrary vector and C is a path from [tex]\vec{a}[/tex] to [tex]\vec{b}[/tex]. Hint: is [tex]\vec{v}[/tex] the gradient of something? What does this result tell you about [tex] \int_C d\vec{\ell} \,\, ?[/tex]
 
ok the result of this integration [tex]v \oint dl = v \int_{a}^{b} dl = v [l]_{a}^{b} = v (b - a)[/tex]

im not sure what v is the gradient of, however.
 
A couple of things and you should have your answer.

First, don't forget that [tex]\vec{a}[/tex] and [tex]\vec{b}[/tex] are vectors. I don't know if you're confused about this, or if you just don't bother to notate it, or if you can't get LaTeX to work. I just wanted to emphasize this point either way.

Second, are you sure you can't find a function that [tex]\vec{v}[/tex] is the gradient of? Hint: the partial derivative with respect to x of your unknown function is [tex]v_x[/tex], a constant.

Third, your very close to your answer, here and in the other thread. All you need to do is convince yourself (or more properly, the grader) that
[tex] \int_C d\vec{\ell} = \vec{b} - \vec{a}[/tex]
independent of the path C. Once you have this fact, the answers to both your questions are easy to get.