Proving Geometric Fact: u+v Perpendicular to u-v Using Dot Product

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that the vectors u + v and u - v are perpendicular using the dot product in linear algebra. Participants emphasize that since u and v are of equal length, the dot product (u - v)·(u + v) can be simplified to |u|² - |v|², which equals 0, confirming their perpendicularity. The geometric interpretation relates to the parallelogram rule, where u and v represent two sides of a parallelogram, making u + v and u - v the diagonals.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector operations, specifically dot product and cross product.
  • Familiarity with the properties of vectors, including magnitude and direction.
  • Knowledge of geometric concepts related to vectors, such as the parallelogram rule.
  • Basic linear algebra concepts, particularly in the context of first-year university coursework.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the dot product in depth, including its geometric interpretations.
  • Explore the parallelogram law and its applications in vector addition.
  • Learn about vector projections and their relevance in determining angles between vectors.
  • Investigate the implications of vector orthogonality in higher-dimensional spaces.
USEFUL FOR

Students in linear algebra, educators teaching vector mathematics, and anyone interested in the geometric properties of vectors and their applications in physics and engineering.

Teggles
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
"If u and v are any two vectors of the same length, use the dot product to show that
u + v is perpendicular to u − v. What fact from geometry is does this represent."

This is basically the last question in an assignment on vectors (first year university, linear algebra). The questions all focus on things like equations of planes, angles of intersection etc. that require little insight. This one however seems to require quite a lot of insight.

I understand how to calculate the dot product, cross product, length of vectors, angle between vectors, etc., but I don't even know where to start here.

If anyone could help me through this, it'd be extremely appreciated :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


Well, I hate to be obtuse but if you "understand how to calculate the dot product" and the problem tells you to use the dot product, isn't it obvious that you should start by taking the dot product?

What is the dot product (u- v)\cdot(u+ v)[?
 


Well...

(u - v) . (u + v) = |u - v| |u + v| cos θ

Of course, I don't know |u - v| or |u + v|, only that |u| and |v| are the same. I don't know how this bit of information is meant to be used.

If the vectors are perpendicular, θ will be 90 degrees, and so dot product will be 0. Is my aim to therefore prove that the dot product is 0? How? Though the other method of calculating the dot product? I'm sorry, I just feel clueless.
 
Last edited:


Try writing out the vectors' entries, i.e. u = (u1, u2, u3) and v = (v1, v2, v3) and use the entry-wise definition of the dot product. Also try writing out what |u| = |v| means in terms of the entries.
 


No! You don't have to be as complicated as either of those. (u+ v)\cdot(u- v)= u\cdot u- u\cdot v+ v\cdot u- v\cdot v= |u|^2- |v|^2 because the dot product is commutative so that -u\cdot v+ v\cdot u= 0
 
Last edited by a moderator:


Awesome. I managed to write a full proof that it would equal 0. I'm fairly glad you omitted some of the reasoning/detail because it actually made me think about and understand each step for myself. Thanks for your help!

Still haven't worked out what "geometric fact" the question wants, but I'll work on it.
 


Think about the "parallelogram" rule for adding vectors. If u and v are two sides of a parallelogram, what are u+ v and u- v?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K