Proving inequality related to certain property of function

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving an inequality related to a real-valued function that satisfies the functional equation f(x+y) = f(x) . f(y) for all real numbers x and y. The specific inequality to prove is f((x + y) / 2) ≤ 1/2 (f(x) + f(y)).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster seeks hints to begin solving the problem, noting a relationship they found involving f(x). Some participants suggest using the Arithmetic Mean-Geometric Mean (AM-GM) inequality, while others propose considering the implications of assuming the result to be proven.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring various approaches, including the use of AM-GM and the strategy of assuming the result to derive familiar inequalities. There is engagement with different lines of reasoning, but no consensus has been reached on a specific method or solution.

Contextual Notes

Some participants question the assumptions underlying the problem, particularly regarding the positivity of the function values involved in the AM-GM application.

songoku
Messages
2,512
Reaction score
394

Homework Statement


Consider a real valued function f which satisfies the equation f (x+y) = f (x) . f (y) for all real numbers x and y. Prove:

f ((x + y) / 2) ≤ 1/2 (f(x) + f(y))

Homework Equations


Not sure

The Attempt at a Solution


Please give me a hint to start solving this question. I have found that f (x) = (f (x/2))2 but I don't know what to do next.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use AM-GM, ##{A+B\over 2} \ge \sqrt{AB}## where ##A,B >0##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
Buffu said:
Use AM-GM, ##{A+B\over 2} \ge \sqrt{AB}## where ##A,B >0##.

Thank you
 
For any ##a,b\in \mathbb{R}##, we have the following ##(a-b)^2 \geqslant 0##. Then let ##a = f(\frac{x}{2})## and ##b = f(\frac{y}{2})##, and see if you reach conclusion.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
Songoku, when you are asked to prove something, sometimes, its wise to assume the result which you have been asked to prove. And you have both, the hypothesis and the conclusion. And with it, you try to see where does this lead to. Lot of times, this leads to some other familiar result. And then you can work backwards from that familiar result. This is one of those situations. Here if you assume the result, then using the hypothesis, you reach the result ##(a-b)^2 \geqslant 0##, if you let ##a = f(\frac{x}{2})## and ##b = f(\frac{y}{2})##. But now ##(a-b)^2 \geqslant 0## is a familiar result, which is true for all ##(a-b) \in \mathbb{R}## . Now you can work backwards.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
IssacNewton said:
Songoku, when you are asked to prove something, sometimes, its wise to assume the result which you have been asked to prove. And you have both, the hypothesis and the conclusion. And with it, you try to see where does this lead to. Lot of times, this leads to some other familiar result. And then you can work backwards from that familiar result. This is one of those situations. Here if you assume the result, then using the hypothesis, you reach the result ##(a-b)^2 \geqslant 0##, if you let ##a = f(\frac{x}{2})## and ##b = f(\frac{y}{2})##. But now ##(a-b)^2 \geqslant 0## is a familiar result, which is true for all ##(a-b) \in \mathbb{R}## . Now you can work backwards.

Thank you very much for the advice
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K