Proving Inequality: x^2+2xy+3y^2+2x+6y+4 >= 1 for All Real Values of x and y

  • Thread starter Thread starter siddharthmishra19
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality Proof
Click For Summary
The inequality x^2 + 2xy + 3y^2 + 2x + 6y + 4 >= 1 for all real values of x and y can be approached by finding the minimum of the left-hand side function. To do this, one should calculate the partial derivatives and identify the critical points to confirm they yield a minimum value that is greater than or equal to 1. An alternative geometric interpretation suggests that the equation represents a pair of straight lines, which must remain above the line y=1, implying they are parallel. Additionally, modifying the inequality by adding 2 reveals that it describes an ellipse, indicating that its lowest point lies above y=3. Overall, these methods provide a comprehensive approach to proving the inequality.
siddharthmishra19
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
For all real values of x and y prove that
x^2+2xy+3y^2+2x+6y+4 >= 1

I am trying to express the left side as a sum of sqares but always come short. Help will be appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You are going to have trouble doing it that way. Just treat the problem as the problem of finding the minimum of the function on the LHS of your inequality. Find the point where the two partial derivatives vanish and verify the that point is a minimum and that it's >= 1.
 
I want to float another option. In this equation, abc+2fgh-af^2-bg^2-ch^2 is not 0. Therefore this curve represents a pair of straight lines. Geometrically this means that the pair of lines must always remain above the line y=1. The only way this is possible is if the pair of lines is parallel. If you find the equations of the two lines, then you should find that they lie above y=1.
 
chaoseverlasting said:
I want to float another option. In this equation, abc+2fgh-af^2-bg^2-ch^2 is not 0. Therefore this curve represents a pair of straight lines. Geometrically this means that the pair of lines must always remain above the line y=1. The only way this is possible is if the pair of lines is parallel. If you find the equations of the two lines, then you should find that they lie above y=1.

In what sense is a function of two variables a 'curve'? A level surface would be a curve - but which one? I don't get it.
 
Sorry, I meant a conic section, or a pair of straight lines in the xy plane of the type ax^2+2hxy+by^2+2gx+2fy+c=0. Here though, even if delta is not 0, it doesn't seem to be a straight line (the two constant terms are coming out to be complex). If you add 2 to both sides of the inequality, then this equation represents an ellipse with its axis rotated. So, the lowest point must lie above the line y=3.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K