Proving Isometries: A Step-By-Step Guide

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Doradus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proving properties of isometries in the context of linear algebra, specifically focusing on a linear map defined on a vector space V with an inner product. Participants are exploring the existence and properties of such maps, including their matrix representations and eigenvectors, as well as clarifying notation and definitions related to the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes to show that there is exactly one linear map ##\Phi:V \rightarrow V## with specific properties on subspaces W and ##W^\bot##, but expresses uncertainty about their derivation.
  • Another participant requests clarification on notation and suggests that the basis sets should span the entire space V, not just the subspaces.
  • A clarification on the notation is provided, explaining terms like ##\Phi |_W## and ##D_{BB}##, but uncertainty remains about the meaning of ##D_{BS}##.
  • One participant suggests proving uniqueness by showing that two linear maps must be equal based on their matrix representations.
  • A specific example is given for the case where ##V = \mathbb{R}^3##, illustrating the matrix representation of ##\Phi## in the standard basis.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the need to clarify notation and definitions, but there is no consensus on the completeness of the initial derivation or the interpretation of certain terms. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to proving the properties of the linear map.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the clarity of notation and definitions, which may affect the understanding of the problem. The discussion also highlights the dependence on the choice of basis and the representation of linear maps.

Doradus
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello,

i'm trying to prove this statements, but I'm stuck.

Be ##V=R^n## furnished with the standard inner product and the standard basis S.
And let W ##\subseteq## V be a subspace of V and let ##W^\bot## be the orthogonal complement.

a) Show that there is exactly one linear map ##\Phi:V \rightarrow V## with ##\Phi|_w=id_w## and with ##\Phi|_{w^\bot}=-id_{w^\bot}##

b) Show that V have an orthonormal basis B consisting of the eigenvectors of ##\Phi## and indicate ##D_{BB}(\Phi##

c) Show that ##D_{BS}(id_v)## and ##D_{SS}(\Phi)## are orthogonal matrices.
For a) i have the following incomplete derivation:

Be ##a_1##...##a_n## an orthonormal basis of W and be ##b_1##...##b_n## an orthonormal basis of ##W^\bot##.
Therefore ##\Phi## is defined as ##\Phi: a_i \mapsto a_i, b_i \mapsto -b_j## with 1##\le##i##\le##n and 1##\le##j##\le##n. We can see that ##a_i## and ##b_i## are eigenvectors of ##\Phi##.

And now I'm stuck. I'm sure, i saw somewhere an prove with this derivation. But i don't remember. Is this even a good starting point or a dead end?
Well, I'm not very good at mathematical prooves.
But maybe someone can help me with the next step or someone have an other idea to proove this.
Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am somewhat unfamiliar with your notation.
Could you please provide a bit more detail about what is meant by:
##\Phi |_\omega, d_\omega, D_{BB}, D_{BS}, \text{ and } D_{SS} ##

One thing I notice right off is you define two n-dimensional basis sets -- one spanning W and the other spanning Wperp. With n vectors, you should span both spaces, or all of V.
Let ##\{ a_i\}_{i=1}^n## be a basis set for V, ordered in such a way that ##\exists k,## such that ## \{ a_i\}_{i=1}^k## is a basis set for ##W## and ## \{ a_i\}_{i=k+1}^n## is a basis set for ##W^\perp##.
 
##\Phi |_W## is the same as ##\Phi(W)##
##id_W## is the identity funktion ##\Phi(w)=w##
##D_{BB}## Matrix with basis B
##D_{SS}## Matrix with basis S
##D_{BS}## I am not sure. :-)

Well, because I'm not sure, what ##D_{BS}## means, i think c) is not that important. I'm more interested in a) and b).
 
I see. thanks for the explanation.
For the first one, assume there are two linear maps then show that they must be equal. Because a linear map can be uniquely defined by its matrix representation, showing that the matrix representation must be the same should work.
##D_{BB} ## is a matrix that takes an input from basis B and gives an output in basis B.
##D_{SS} ## is a matrix that takes an input from basis S and gives an output in basis S.
Then, ##D_{BS} ## should be a matrix that takes an input from basis B and gives an output in basis S.

Look at a simple example, Let ##V = \mathbb{R}^3 ##, then ##S = \{ \hat x, \hat y, \hat z\}##, ##W## is the xy-plane. ##W^\perp## is span of ##\hat z##.
The matrix representation of ##[\Phi ]_{SS} = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & -1 \end{bmatrix}##
In your question 2, you are asked to give the matrix representation in the eigenbasis B...which should be pretty similar.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
923
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K