MHB Proving |PR|=3|RQ|: Two Particles Collide

  • Thread starter Thread starter markosheehan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particles
markosheehan
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
a particle is projected vertically upwards from a point P. at the same instant a second particle is let fall from rest vertically at q. q is directly above p. the 2 particles collide at a point r after t seconds . when the 2 particles collide they are traveling at equal speeds. prove that |pr|=3|rq|

i am trying to solve this with uvast equations for the first particle i have v=v s=r a=-g t=t for the second particle i have v=v s=p-r a=g t=t don't know where to go from here
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would begin by orienting the vertical axis of motion such that point $p$ is at the origin. The first particle's position is then given by:

$$x_1=-\frac{a}{2}t^2+v_0t$$

And the second particle's position is:

$$x_2=-\frac{a}{2}t^2+q$$

Now, when the two particles meet, we have:

$$x_1=x_2\implies t=\frac{q}{v_0}$$

At this time, their speeds are equal, hence:

$$-at+v_0=at\implies v_0=2at$$

Hence:

$$t^2=\frac{q}{2a}$$

And so we find:

$$r=-\frac{a}{2}\cdot\frac{q}{2a}+q=\frac{3}{4}q$$

And this implies:

$$\overline{pr}=3\overline{rq}$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top