MHB Proving: Sets Proofs - Techniques & Examples

  • Thread starter Thread starter paulmdrdo1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Sets
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving two mathematical statements involving set operations. The first proof requires demonstrating that if sets A and B are disjoint, then the Cartesian products of A and C, and B and C, are also disjoint. The second proof involves showing that the union of A and the intersection of B and C is equal to the intersection of the unions of A with B and A with C. Participants express difficulty in formalizing their proofs and seek techniques for structured reasoning, emphasizing the importance of understanding set relationships and logical implications in proofs. Overall, the conversation highlights the challenges of formal proof writing and the need for clear methodologies in mathematical reasoning.
paulmdrdo1
Messages
382
Reaction score
0
prove the followinga. prove that if $A\cap B=\emptyset$, then $(A\times C)\cap (B\times C)=\emptyset$
b. $A\cup(B\cap C)=(A\cup B)\cap (A\cup C)$

i don't have any idea how i would start proving this.
can you give me some techniques on proofs.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
paulmdrdo said:
prove the followinga. prove that if $A\cap B=\emptyset$, then $(A\times C)\cap (B\times C)=\emptyset$
b. $A\cup(B\cap C)=(A\cup B)\cap (A\cup C)$

i don't have any idea how i would start proving this.
can you give me some techniques on proofs.
a. Assume on the contrary that $(x,y)\in (A\times C)\cap (B\times C)$. Thus $x\in A\cap B$ and $y\in C$ (why?). Can you finish?

b. Let $x\in A\cup(B\cap C)$. Then $x\in A$ or $x\in B\cap C$.
Case 1. $x\in A$.
Here $x\in A\cup B$ and $x\in A\cup C$. (why?). Thus $x\in (A\cup B)\cap (A\cup C)$.

Case 2. $x\in B\cap C$.
Again, Here $x\in A\cup B$ and $x\in A\cup C$. (why?). Thus $x\in (A\cup B)\cap (A\cup C)$.

The above shows that any element of $A\cup (B\cap C)$ is in $(A\cup B)\cap(A\cup C)$. This means $A\cup (B\cap C)\subseteq (A\cup B)\cap(A\cup C)$. Can you show the reverse containment and finish?
 
caffeinemachine i know nothing about formal way of proving. i can say why that is true in words or verbally but not in a generalize way. i want a formal presentation of proofs like what you are doing. can you give some tips. because every time i encounter this kind of problems i always feel discouraged.

but this is what i tried

$x\in A\cap B$ and $y\in C$ because we assume that $(x,y)\in (A\times C)\cap (B\times C) $

i don't know howfill in the other (whys)
 
paulmdrdo said:
caffeinemachine i know nothing about formal way of proving. i can say why that is true in words or verbally but not in a generalize way. i want a formal presentation of proofs like what you are doing. can you give some tips. because every time i encounter this kind of problems i always feel discouraged.

but this is what i tried

$x\in A\cap B$ and $y\in C$ because we assume that $(x,y)\in (A\times C)\cap (B\times C) $

i don't know howfill in the other (whys)
The 'second why' is quite straightforward. If you know that $x\in A$, then $x$ also lies in any superset of $A$. Isn't it? Thus $x\in A$ gives $x\in A\cup B$ since $A\cup B$ is a superset of $A$. Similarly $x\in A$ gives $A\cup C$ too.

Now try to fill in for the third why.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Back
Top