Proving that the Dirac Delta is the limit of Gaussians

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that the limit of a Gaussian function approaches the Dirac Delta function as λ approaches zero. Specifically, the mathematical expression is given by the limit of the integral of the Gaussian function multiplied by an arbitrary function φ(x), which converges to φ(0). The participants explore various methods to split the integral and analyze the behavior of the Gaussian function, emphasizing the need for a rigorous mathematical approach to validate the limit. A suggestion is made to utilize polar coordinates and double integrals to simplify the proof.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Dirac Delta function and its properties
  • Familiarity with Gaussian functions and their integrals
  • Knowledge of limits and convergence in calculus
  • Experience with integration techniques, including integration by parts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Dirac Delta function in distribution theory
  • Learn about the convergence of integrals involving Gaussian functions
  • Explore polar coordinates and double integrals for simplifying complex integrals
  • Investigate integration techniques, particularly integration by parts, in the context of limits
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, physicists, and anyone interested in advanced calculus and distribution theory, particularly those studying the properties of the Dirac Delta function and Gaussian integrals.

xWaffle
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I need to prove for arbitrary functions φ(x) that:

[tex]\lim_{\lambda \to 0} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi} \lambda} exp\left( \frac{-x^{2}}{2 \lambda^{2}} \right) \varphi(x) dx = \varphi(0),[/tex]

which, in the sense of distributions is basically the delta function,

[tex]\frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi} \lambda} exp\left( \frac{-x^{2}}{2 \lambda^{2}} \right) = \delta (x)[/tex]

Homework Equations


(see above)


The Attempt at a Solution


I can easily explain graphically what happens as λ→0, i.e., as λ approaches zero, the width of the distribution gets thinner and thinner, and the height of the peak gets higher and higher; the limit, of course, being an infinitely high and infinitesimally thin spike (which we know as the Dirac delta function).

JgHoWhc.png


Now, to prove this mathematically, I've seen some weird and completely different approaches being taken here, in random lecture notes I find around the web, and on stackoverflow. Everyone's approach is different but none really hit home with me.

After discussing with my professor a bit, he hinted I should try to split the integral up (I'm assuming into a part from -∞ to some arbitrary constant -c, -c to c, and c to +∞. Nothing I can find online or in my textbook resembles this, which makes me think we're supposed to be really stretching our brains with this one.

So, if I split the integral up,

[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi} \lambda} exp\left( \frac{-x^{2}}{2 \lambda^{2}} \right) \varphi(x) dx = \int_{-\infty}^{-c} \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi} \lambda} exp\left( \frac{-x^{2}}{2 \lambda^{2}} \right) \varphi(x) dx + \int_{-c}^{c} \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi} \lambda} exp\left( \frac{-x^{2}}{2 \lambda^{2}} \right) \varphi(x) dx + \int_{c}^{\infty} \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi} \lambda} exp\left( \frac{-x^{2}}{2 \lambda^{2}} \right) \varphi(x) dx[/tex]

Now what..? How does this help me? I realize c is free to be whatever we want it to be, but how can that put us onto a path to proving:

[tex]\lim_{\lambda \to 0} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi} \lambda} exp\left( \frac{-x^{2}}{2 \lambda^{2}} \right) \varphi(x) dx = \varphi(0)?[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi xWaffle! :smile:

have you tried the same method as for φ = constant?

ie make it the square-root of the double integral ∫∫ (1/2πλ2) e-r22 φ(rcosθ)φ(rsinθ) rdrdθ,

integrate wrt θ, then integrate by parts:

i think the [] part is [φ(0)]2, and the ∫ part has no 1/λ and so hopefully can be proved to –> 0
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K