Dragonfall
- 1,023
- 5
Is there a simple way of proving that x=2^x can't happen for real x? Without series expansion.
The discussion revolves around the question of whether the equation x=2^x can have real solutions. Participants explore various approaches to prove or disprove the existence of such solutions without using series expansion, focusing on mathematical reasoning and properties of the functions involved.
Participants express differing views on the behavior of the functions and their derivatives, leading to no consensus on the existence of solutions to the equation x=2^x. The discussion remains unresolved with competing arguments presented.
Some mathematical steps and assumptions are not fully resolved, particularly regarding the behavior of derivatives and the implications for the existence of solutions. The discussion also highlights the need for careful consideration of function properties over specified intervals.
Most definitely not!Werg22 said:Much simpler is to write 2^x - x = 0, and take the derivative of LHS: ln(2)2^x - 1. On [0, ∞), this is clearly strictly positive,