Proving the pigeonhole directly. I'm stuck.

  • Thread starter Thread starter psycho2499
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stuck
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the pigeonhole principle directly, specifically demonstrating that |Nk - {x}| = |Nk - 1| for integers k > 1, where x is an element of the natural numbers. Participants suggest that establishing a bijection between the two sets is a sufficient method for proving their equivalence. This approach is confirmed as valid, emphasizing the importance of understanding bijections in set theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of set theory and natural numbers
  • Knowledge of bijections and their properties
  • Familiarity with the pigeonhole principle
  • Basic mathematical proof techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of bijections in set theory
  • Explore the pigeonhole principle in various mathematical contexts
  • Learn about different proof techniques in mathematics
  • Investigate applications of the pigeonhole principle in combinatorics
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in combinatorial proofs and set theory concepts.

psycho2499
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove the pigeonhole principle directly. so basically |Nk-{x}|=|Nk-1| if k>1 is an integer and x belongs to the set of naturals.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I have no idea even where to begin.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Doesn't it suffice to write down a bijection between the two sets you mentioned?
 
Yeah I guess that would work since things are equivalent if they are a bijection. Thanks man
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K