Proving Theorem 2: At Least 2 Games Played

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter narledge
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Theorem 2 establishes that a minimum of two games must be played among at least four distinct teams (A, B, C, D) under the given axioms. Axiom 1 specifies that each game involves two distinct teams, while Axiom 3 mandates that each team participates in at least one game. Axiom 4 restricts each team from playing against another more than once. By analyzing various scenarios, it is concluded that at least two games are necessary to satisfy all axioms, ensuring a robust proof structure.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of combinatorial game theory
  • Familiarity with logical axioms and their implications
  • Knowledge of distinct pairings in game theory
  • Ability to construct mathematical proofs
NEXT STEPS
  • Study combinatorial game theory principles
  • Learn about constructing proofs in mathematical logic
  • Explore the concept of distinct pairings in game theory
  • Research examples of axiomatic systems in mathematics
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, game theorists, and students studying combinatorial logic who are interested in proof construction and the implications of axiomatic systems.

narledge
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I need help with proving the theorem below

Axiom 1: Each game is played by two distinct teams.
Axiom 2: There are at least four teams.
Axiom 3: There are at least one game played by each team
Axiom 4: Each distinct team plays each of the other teams at most one time

Theorem 2: At minimum there are two games played
According to axiom 2, there are at least four teams and we will call them team A, B, C, D. Since axiom 1 requires that a game is played between two distinct games so team A could playing team C and team B could play D. Axiom 4 states that each team plays each of the other teams no more than once. Each of the four teams are playing at least one game which is required by axiom 3. Therefore, at minimum there are two games played.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
narledge said:
Since axiom 1 requires that a game is played between two distinct games so team A could playing team C and team B could play D.
What if A played B or D and the other two teams played among themselves? What if A played a team that is not B, C or D? A proof must consider all cases.

narledge said:
Axiom 4 states that each team plays each of the other teams no more than once.
This does not help advance the proof since this statement only limits the number of played games from above, while the theorem bounds them from below.

narledge said:
Each of the four teams are playing at least one game which is required by axiom 3. Therefore, at minimum there are two games played.
To justifiably say "therefore" you must consider different cases as described above, and in each case conclude that there are at least two games. Otherwise, this seems like a gap in the proof.
 
Thank you for your help, could your offer any additional assistance for how I could write it to make the proof correct?
 
I would start as you did: According to axiom 2, there are at least four teams and we will call them A, B, C, D. By Axiom 3, A played a game. Let's call its opponent in this game X. Then there is at least one team Y among B, C and D that is not X. By Axiom 3, Y also played a game, and that game must be different from the one between A and X since Y is distinct from both A and X. Thus, we found at least two games.

Note that I assume something that is not, strictly speaking, stated explicitly in the axioms, namely, that games between two different unordered pairs of teams are distinct. In other words, if X and Y played a game and U and V played a game and $\{X, Y\}\ne\{U, V\}$, then these are two different games.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
606
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K