Proving Variance of a Random Variable with Moment-Generating Functions

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dmatador
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Variance
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the variance of a transformed random variable W, defined as W = aY + b, using moment-generating functions (mgf). Participants explore the relationship between the variance of W and the variance of Y, focusing on the application of moment-generating functions in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states the relationship V(W) = V(Y) * a^2 and expresses frustration over the complexity of their previous attempts to prove it.
  • Another participant provides a derivation of the expected value and variance of W using the definitions of expected values and variances, suggesting that V(W) can be expressed in terms of V(Y).
  • A third participant expresses gratitude for the clarification on using the moment-generating function for W, indicating that this approach was previously overlooked.
  • One participant questions whether the moment-generating function was indeed supposed to be used, and proceeds to derive the mean and variance of W using the mgf, showing detailed calculations that lead to the conclusion that V(W) = a^2 * V(Y).

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the relationship between the variances of W and Y, but there is some contention regarding the necessity and application of the moment-generating function in the proof process. The discussion includes multiple approaches and interpretations, indicating that no consensus has been reached on the best method to prove the variance relationship.

Contextual Notes

Some calculations and assumptions regarding the moment-generating functions and their derivatives are presented, but there are unresolved steps in the derivations, particularly concerning the application of the mgf and its implications for variance.

dmatador
Messages
120
Reaction score
1
Suppose that Y is a random variable with moment-generating function m(t) and W = aY + b, with a moment-generating function of m(at) * e^(tb). Prove that V(W) = V(Y) * a^2. I have done an absurd amount of work on this problem, and I know its actual solution doesn't have one and a half pages worth of work needed. I have tried to find the variances separately and also to find the expected values, but this just gave me a big mess of equations and I need some advice.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
E(W)= aE(Y) + b
E(W2)=a2E(Y2) + 2abE(Y) + b2
V(W)=E(W2)-(E(W))2=a2(E(Y2)-E(Y)2)=a2V(Y)
 
Thanks a lot man. I kept trying to use the moment-generating function for W. This is a big help.
 
Are you sure you were not supposed to use the mgf?

<br /> \begin{align*}<br /> m_W(t) &amp; = e^{tb} m_Y(at) \\<br /> m&#039;_W(t) &amp; = be^{tb} m_Y(at) + ae^{tb} m&#039;_Y(at) \\<br /> \mu_W &amp; = m&#039;_W(0) = b + a\mu_Y <br /> \end{align*}<br />

so the mean of W is a\mu_Y + b.

Remember that the second derivative, evaluated at t = 0, is \sigma^2 + \mu^2 [/tex].<br /> <br /> &lt;br /&gt; \begin{align*}&lt;br /&gt; m&amp;#039;_W(t) &amp;amp; = (bm_Y(at) + am&amp;#039;_Y(at)) e^{tb} \\&lt;br /&gt; m&amp;#039;&amp;#039;_W(t) &amp;amp; =b(bm_Y(at) + am&amp;#039;_Y(at)) e^{b}+ (abm&amp;#039;_Y(at) + a^2m&amp;#039;&amp;#039;_Y(at))e^{tb} \\&lt;br /&gt; m&amp;#039;&amp;#039;_W(0) &amp;amp; = b(b + a\mu_Y) + (ab\mu_Y + a^2 (\sigma^2_y + \mu^2_Y)) \\&lt;br /&gt; &amp;amp; = a^2 \sigma_Y^2 + a^2\mu_Y^2 + 2ab\mu_Y + b^2 \\&lt;br /&gt; &amp;amp; = a^2 \sigma_Y^2 + (a\mu_Y + b)^2&lt;br /&gt; \end{align*}&lt;br /&gt;<br /> <br /> The final line in the second bit is E[W^2], so the variance of W is<br /> <br /> &lt;br /&gt; a^2 \sigma^2_Y + (a\mu_Y+b)^2 - (a\mu_Y + b)^2 = a^2 \sigma^2_Y&lt;br /&gt;
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K