Proving Vector Space of Circles is Not Axiomatic

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that the set of circles does not form a vector space axiomatically. Participants emphasize the necessity of defining addition and scalar multiplication operators for circles. They highlight the importance of verifying the ten vector space axioms to establish this proof. The conversation suggests that without proper definitions and checks against these axioms, the claim remains unsubstantiated.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector space axioms
  • Knowledge of addition and scalar multiplication operators
  • Familiarity with geometric definitions of circles
  • Basic principles of linear algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the ten axioms of vector spaces
  • Learn how to define addition and scalar multiplication for geometric shapes
  • Explore examples of sets that do and do not form vector spaces
  • Study the implications of subspaces in vector space theory
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of linear algebra, and educators seeking to understand the properties of vector spaces and their axiomatic foundations.

mikeeey
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
Hi
How can i prove that the set if circles does not form a vector space AXIOMATICALLY .
( i am not considering a circle lives in xy-plane ( subset ) as a subspace of xy-plane
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Could you check your post and perhaps re-formulate it in correct sentences so that it becomes understandable? Thank you.
 
Hey mikeeey.

You will need to define your addition and scalar multiplication operators and then check the usual 10 axioms.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
6K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K