[Q]Analytic function of operator A

  • Thread starter Thread starter good_phy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Operator
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a problem related to the analytic function of an operator A, specifically addressing the equation g(A)f(φ) = g(a)f(φ) where Aφ = aφ. The user attempts to use Taylor expansion for both f(φ) and g(A) but struggles with terms involving A applied to powers of φ. There is a suggestion to avoid expanding f and instead demonstrate that A^n f = a^n f through repeated application of the operator. The conversation highlights confusion regarding the application of operators to squared wavefunctions and the implications of Dirac notation. Ultimately, the conclusion is that the initial approach is incorrect.
good_phy
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Hi, 5.27 problem in liboff says that if g(A)f(\varphi) = g(a)f(\varphi),where A\varphi = a\varphi

I tried to solve this problem with tylar expansion.

f(\varphi) = f(0) + f^{'}(0)\varphi + \frac{f^{''}(0)}{2!}\varphi^2 + \frac{f^{(3)}(0)}{3!}\varphi^3 + ...

g(A) = g(0) + g^{'}(0)A + \frac{g^{''}(0)}{2!}A^2 + \frac{g^{(3)}(0)}{3!}A^3 + ...

But when i applied g(A) to f(\varphi) i can not get right hand side of equality

written above because i don't know how can i deal with unseen term such as

A\varphi^2or A^2\varphi or etc

please assist to me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't expand f.
Show that A^n f=a^n f, which is easy to show by repeated use of Af=af.
 
Ya I now your way, but How can i deal with A\varphi^n showed in product

of f(\varphi) expansion and g(A) expansion
 
As you show, expanding f is useless, because you don't know A\phi^2.
 
I think in this way, in Dirac notation

<br /> A(\|phi&gt;)^2=(A\|phi&gt;)|phi&gt;=(a\|phi&gt;)|phi&gt;=a|phi&gt;^2<br /> <br />
Similarly,
<br /> <br /> A^2\|phi&gt;=A(A\|phi&gt;)=A(a\|phi&gt;)=a(A|phi&gt;)=a^2|phi&gt;<br />

The second equation is straightforward.
The first equation sounds a bit weird to me. I feel like I maybe wrong.
 
Just checking -- what do you think f&#039;&#039;(0) and \varphi^2 mean?
 
Like Hurkyl pointed out,

one single operator acts on \psi^2 , acts on two wavefunction, sounds weird.I don't know how to explain it.
 
cks said:
I think in this way, in Dirac notation

<br /> A(\|phi&gt;)^2=(A\|phi&gt;)|phi&gt;=(a\|phi&gt;)|phi&gt;=a|phi&gt;^2<br /> <br />
Similarly,
<br /> <br /> A^2\|phi&gt;=A(A\|phi&gt;)=A(a\|phi&gt;)=a(A|phi&gt;)=a^2|phi&gt;<br />

The second equation is straightforward.
The first equation sounds a bit weird to me. I feel like I maybe wrong.

It is wrong.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K