Q: How can I solve a population growth problem using the general equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ksle82
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Growth
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving a population growth problem using the general equation N=No*e^(rt). The user seeks to determine the time required for a population to triple, given that it doubles in two years. The solution involves calculating the growth constant "r" as ln(2)/2 and finding "t" using the formula t=2ln(3)/ln(2), resulting in approximately 3.170 years. The conversation confirms the validity of the exponential growth formula and discusses an alternative approach using P(t)=P_0 2^(t/2).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of exponential growth equations
  • Knowledge of natural logarithms and their properties
  • Familiarity with population dynamics concepts
  • Basic proficiency in using scientific calculators for logarithmic calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of the exponential growth formula N=No*e^(rt)
  • Learn about logarithmic functions and their applications in population studies
  • Explore alternative population growth models, such as logistic growth
  • Investigate the implications of different growth rates on population projections
USEFUL FOR

Students, mathematicians, and biologists interested in population dynamics and mathematical modeling of growth processes.

ksle82
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
im trying to solve a population growth problem. not sure if I am using the right eqn. Please check:

Q: if the population doubles in two years, how long does it take to triple?

Solution:

general equation for population growth: N=No*e^(rt)
1) find unknown constant "r" from given
2No=No*e^(rt)
from equation, r= ln(2)/2
2) find "t" for population to triple
3No=No*e^(rt)
solving for t: t=2ln(3)/ln(2) ~ 3.170 years
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If that's the equation your given then yes you are using the right equation. Just verify that t is indeed measured in years rather than some other time scale. Also verify that they imply triple to mean 3No not 3(2No). Even thoughy you used a calculator i think you can still simplify ln(3)/ln(2)
 
neurocomp2003 said:
If that's the equation your given then yes you are using the right equation.
thats the problem I am not sure I am using the right equation.
 
Yes, that's a perfectly valid formula.

However, you could also use
P(t)= P_0 2^{\frac{t}{2}}
(every two years, t/2 is an integer, so we have multiplies by 2 t/2 times.)
then
P(t)= 3P_0= P_0 2^{\frac{T}{2}
2^{\frac{T}{2}}= 3
\left(\frac{T}{2}\right) log(2)= log(3)
T= \frac{2 log(3)}{ log(2)}
as you have.
 
also note that your equation when substituted with your given value of "r" simplies to the equation posted by HallsOfIvy
 
Exactly. All "exponentials" are interchangable. That's why you only need log base 10 and log base e on your calculator.
2^{\frac{t}{2}}= e^{ln(2^{\frac{t}{2}}= e^\frac{t}{2}ln(2)
which is e^{rt} with r= ln(2)/2.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K