Q: What is the maximum dimension of [D - λ]^-1(W) for a subspace W of V?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chris L T521
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The maximum dimension of the inverse operator [D - λ]^-1 applied to a subspace W of V is proven to be at most dim(W) + 1. This conclusion is derived from analyzing the relationship between the kernel and image of the operator T, which is the restriction of D - λ to the subspace U = [D - λ]^-1(W). The proof establishes that the kernel of T is a subspace of the kernel of D - λ, which has dimension 1, leading to the final result.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear operators in functional analysis
  • Familiarity with the concepts of kernel and image of an operator
  • Knowledge of exponential functions and their properties in the context of differential equations
  • Basic concepts of dimension in vector spaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of linear operators, particularly in functional analysis
  • Learn about the spectral theory of operators, focusing on the implications of eigenvalues and eigenvectors
  • Explore the relationship between kernels and images in the context of linear transformations
  • Investigate the applications of exponential functions in solving differential equations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, graduate students in mathematics, and anyone studying functional analysis or differential equations will benefit from this discussion.

Chris L T521
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
913
Reaction score
0
Here's this week's problem!

-----

Problem
: It is a basic result in analysis that for any $f\in V$, and any $\lambda\in\mathbb{C}$, $Df=\lambda\cdot f$ if and only if $f(x)=C\cdot e^{\lambda x}$ for some $C\in\mathbb{C}$. Now assume that $W$ is a subspace of $V$. Define $$[D-\lambda]^{-1}(W)=\{f\in V:Df-\lambda f\in W\}.$$

Prove that $\dim([D-\lambda]^{-1}W)\leq\dim(W)+1$.

-----

Remember to read the http://www.mathhelpboards.com/showthread.php?772-Problem-of-the-Week-%28POTW%29-Procedure-and-Guidelines to find out how to http://www.mathhelpboards.com/forms.php?do=form&fid=2!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This week's problem was correctly answered by Deveno. You can find his solution below.

[sp]Let $U = [D - \lambda]^{-1}(W)$ and let $T$ be the restriction of $D-\lambda$ to $U$.

Then we have:

$\dim(U) = \dim(\text{ker }T) + \dim(\text{im }T)$

But $\text{im }T = T(U) = (D-\lambda)(U) = (D-\lambda)([D - \lambda]^{-1}(W)) = W$.

Moreover, we have that $\text{ker }T \subseteq \text{ker }(D-\lambda)$, which has dimension 1, since it is spanned by $\{e^{\lambda x}\}$.

Since $\text{ker }T$ is clearly a subspace of $\text{ker }(D - \lambda)$ (namely: $U \cap \text{ker }(D - \lambda)), \dim(\text{ker }T) \leq 1$.

Thus:

$\dim([D - \lambda]^{-1}(W)) = \dim(U) = \dim(\text{ker }T) + \dim(\text{im }T) = \dim(\text{ker }T) + \dim(W) \leq 1 + \dim(W)$[/sp]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K