QFT Basics: What Does "Ad" Mean in Zeidler's Proofs?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Jimmy Snyder
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The abbreviation "Ad" in Eberhard Zeidler's book "QFT: Basics in Mathematics and Physics" refers to "Ad hoc," meaning "for this" in the context of specific cases within proofs. This usage appears on page 375, where "Ad" precedes enumerated steps in the proof structure. The term is commonly employed in mathematical texts, particularly in German literature, to denote references to particular cases or steps in a logical argument. Understanding this abbreviation enhances comprehension of the proof methodology presented in the text.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with quantum field theory concepts
  • Understanding of linear operators in mathematics
  • Basic knowledge of mathematical proof structures
  • Ability to interpret mathematical abbreviations and terminology
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of "Ad hoc" in mathematical literature
  • Explore the role of adjoint operators in quantum mechanics
  • Study proof techniques in mathematical physics
  • Examine other common abbreviations used in mathematical texts
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics and physics, particularly those studying quantum field theory and mathematical proofs, will benefit from this discussion.

Jimmy Snyder
Messages
1,122
Reaction score
21
I'm reading QFT: Basics in Mathematics and Physics, by Eberhard Zeidler. Once in a while, in his proofs, I see the word (abbreviation?) Ad. For instance on page 375. The author is German and I suppose this imight be common practice in German texts. Does anyone here know what it means?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jimmy Snyder said:
I'm reading QFT: Basics in Mathematics and Physics, by Eberhard Zeidler. Once in a while, in his proofs, I see the word (abbreviation?) Ad. For instance on page 375. The author is German and I suppose this imight be common practice in German texts. Does anyone here know what it means?
Since you don't give an example and most people will not have that book available, I think many will be able to answer this. Since this is posted under "Quantum Physics", and linear operators are often used there, without any more information I would suspect something line "adjoint" as in "ad T" is the adjoint of the operator T. Was "ad" used with an operator or just as a word on its own?
 
I've seen it used as the prefix for an enumeration of the steps in a proof, but don't know what it stands for. I doubt it's mathematically significant, though I suppose it could also be used to refer back to an enumerated step.
 
my_wan said:
I've seen it used as the prefix for an enumeration of the steps in a proof, but don't know what it stands for.
I'm sorry, I didn't realize that there were some people that don't have a copy of the book. It must stand for some kind of enumeration like case N, case R, etc. That's how it is used on page 375.

The form is like this:

Theorem:
(i) a = b
(ii) b = c
Proof.
Ad (i) ...
Ad (ii) ...
 
It's an abbreviation for "Ad hoc" which means "for this" (case) as you guessed.
 
unusualname said:
It's an abbreviation for "Ad hoc" which means "for this" (case) as you guessed.
Thanks unusualname.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
11K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
8K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
11K