Quadrupole Decay Rate E2 Angular Dependence

  • Thread starter MisterX
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation discusses the calculation of the angular dependence of the rate for the emission to a single photon for an electric quadrupole transition from ##\ell = 2## to ##\ell = 0## in a hydrogen atom. Two methods for evaluating this calculation are proposed, one involving spherical tensor operators and the other using conservation of angular momentum. The applicability of the Wigner little d matrix and the role of electromagnetic angular momentum are also discussed.
  • #1
MisterX
764
71
"E2" Quadrupole decay rate
Problem Statement
Obtain the angular dependence of the rate for the emission to a single photon (momentum ##\mathbf{k}## and circular polarization ##\lambda##) for the electric quadrupole transition from ##\ell = 2## to ## \ell = 0##. Neglect electron spin.

Setup
(assumed done in the Coulomb gauge/Radiation gauge)
[itex]H^\prime = \frac{1}{2m} \left( -e\mathbf{p} \cdot \mathbf{A} - e \mathbf{A} \cdot \mathbf{p} + e^2A^2 \right) [/itex]
So we wish to claculate
## \langle n_f\, 0\, 0; \gamma\left(\mathbf{k},\, \lambda\right) \mid H' \mid n_i\, 2\, m_i ; 0\rangle e^{i\omega t}##,
where the first three symbols are ##n \ell m## for the hydrogen atom. In the final state, ##\ell = m = 0##. After ';' comes the photon state. In the final state there is a single photon of wave-vector ##\mathbf{k}## and polarization ##\lambda ## which is ##\pm 1##, depending on circular polarization in the plane orthogonal to ##\mathbf{k} ##.

The polarization vector [itex]\mathbf{\epsilon}[/itex] has that the projection along the direction ##\mathbf{k}## is zero, and the chosen basis for the remaining space is circular polarization along the axis of propagation with the state given by [itex]\lambda[/itex]. The vector itself has three components. The ##{}^* ## below does not mean conjugate transpose but merely conjugate. If you are curious that came from the definition of the [itex]A[/itex] operator, which connected positive and negative frequency plane waves to ladder operators for a given [itex]\mathbf{k},\, \lambda[/itex] but all still within the same space of polarization vectors. Only the conjugate term survived due to the photon number change in this decay.

I will now submit to you that what we really want to calculate is the following:
## \langle n_f\, 0\, 0\mid \left(i\frac{e}{m}\mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{r}\,\boldsymbol{\epsilon}^*\left(\mathbf{k}, \lambda\right)\cdot \mathbf{p}\right)\mid n_i\, 2\, m_i \rangle ##
This came from Taylor expanding ##\mathbf{A}## in powers of ##\mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{r}##.

The Conundrum
Now, there are perhaps two competing methods for evaluating this, which is the central point of this post.
  1. Brake up the above into symmetric and anti-symmetric parts such that the anti-symmetric operator that is equal to zero when between these two elements, leaving you caring only about [itex]\frac{1}{2}\left[\mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{r}\,\boldsymbol{\epsilon}^*\cdot \mathbf{p} + \boldsymbol{\epsilon}^*\cdot \mathbf{r}\,\mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{p}\right][/itex]. Then you separate this into a sum of spherical tensor operators, where the coefficients of the operators have an angular dependence on [itex]\mathbf{k}[/itex]. Parameterize the coefficients using spherical coordinates.
  2. Consider the initial and final total angular momenta and use conservation of angular momentum to constrain the transition. The photon has a superposition of angular momentum states, however if we chose the orbital angular momentum axis to be along [itex]\mathbf{k}[/itex], we are guaranteed [itex]m_{EM, spin} = \pm 1[/itex] and [itex]m_{EM, orbital} = 0[/itex], So the total angular momentum for state with one photon must be a superposition of states all with [itex]m_{EM} = \pm 1[/itex] along the [itex]\mathbf{k}[/itex] axis. Our hydrogen atom was chosen along the z direction however. So the problem becomes finding the component between these angular momentum states directly. The originator of the problem and solution 2 wants the answer to be expressible in terms of a [itex]j = 2[/itex] Wigner d-matrix factor.
I am more familiar with the first method since it was my method of choice. Details of the first method can be found in the attached PDF.

It seemed to me when I checked that the resulting angular dependence from either method might agree up to an irrelevant phase if [itex]\phi = 0[/itex] (the [itex]\phi[/itex] of [itex]\mathbf{k}[/itex] expressed in spherical coordinates). However when [itex]\phi \neq 0[/itex] the results did not seem to agree.

Here's one thing about the second method. We had superposition of different states of the photon angular momentum, which all had some particular projection [itex]m_{EM}[/itex] in the k direction but the terms vary in the total amount of EM angular momentum. We believe the operation of rotating k to be aligned with the conventional axis would would only mix [itex]m_{EM}[/itex] values. Then one might just select one of these terms so that the total angular momentum of of that term matched that of the hydrogen atom before decay.

I am still not sure of the applicability of the Wigner little d matrix. An argument I can make is the following. One can rotate around the axis of angular momentum (z conventionally) and introduce only a phase factor for the individual angular angular momentum states. Then one might suppose the rotation of the particular state that survives [itex]H^\prime[/itex] so that the photon [itex]\mathbf{k}[/itex] of that state was moved to the xz plane would only introduce a phase factor relative to the un-rotated state. Then you would just use the [itex]j = 2[/itex] Wigner d-matrix to give you the correct factor for the [itex]\theta[/itex] between [itex]\mathbf{k}[/itex] and the z axis.

Also I am unsure of dealing with the electromagnetic angular momentum. For example I have read that [itex]\mathbf{L}_{EM}[/itex] and [itex]\mathbf{S}_{EM}[/itex] no longer commute for example, and it's unclear to me what that means for our angular momentum theory or if it means anything important for this problem.
 

Attachments

  • QMII Quadrapole Decay Solution 1.pdf
    156.8 KB · Views: 216
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
A suggested reference is An Introduction to Advanced Quantum Physics by Hans Paar section 1.4.3. pages 32-35.

or

Advanced Quantum Mechanics by J.J. Sakurai p. 44.
 

Related to Quadrupole Decay Rate E2 Angular Dependence

1. What is quadrupole decay rate E2 angular dependence?

Quadrupole decay rate E2 angular dependence refers to the angular distribution of the emitted radiation in a nuclear decay process, specifically in the case of a quadrupole transition where the nuclear spin changes by two units. It is a measure of the probability of emission of a photon in a specific direction relative to the direction of the nuclear spin.

2. How is quadrupole decay rate E2 angular dependence measured?

Quadrupole decay rate E2 angular dependence is typically measured through experiments using gamma-ray detectors. The detectors are placed at different angles around the source of radiation and the intensity of the emitted radiation is measured at each angle. The resulting data is then used to determine the angular distribution of the emitted radiation.

3. What factors affect the quadrupole decay rate E2 angular dependence?

The quadrupole decay rate E2 angular dependence is affected by several factors such as the shape of the nucleus, the energy of the emitted photon, the spin of the nucleus, and the orientation of the nuclear spin with respect to the direction of the emitted photon. The shape of the nucleus is a particularly important factor as it determines the strength and direction of the quadrupole moment, which plays a key role in the angular distribution of the emitted radiation.

4. How does quadrupole decay rate E2 angular dependence differ from other types of nuclear decay?

Quadrupole decay rate E2 angular dependence differs from other types of nuclear decay in that it involves a change in nuclear spin by two units and the emission of a photon with a specific energy and direction. This is in contrast to other types of decay, such as beta and gamma decay, which involve the emission of particles or photons with varying energies and directions.

5. What is the significance of studying quadrupole decay rate E2 angular dependence?

Studying quadrupole decay rate E2 angular dependence is important for understanding the structure and behavior of atomic nuclei. It provides insight into the shape and spin of the nucleus, which are key properties that determine how a nucleus will decay. This information can also be used in practical applications, such as in nuclear medicine and nuclear energy production.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
3
Replies
87
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
629
Back
Top