Can Raising and Lowering Operators Be Found for an Anharmonic Oscillator?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the possibility of finding raising and lowering operators for an anharmonic oscillator with a Hamiltonian that includes higher-order terms, such as a quartic potential. While such operators exist for any quantum system, they are typically not simple functions of position and momentum operators in the anharmonic case. The Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization rule provides an approximate method to derive these operators, particularly in the semiclassical limit, but it has limitations, especially for low quantum numbers. The action-angle variables approach offers a heuristic framework for constructing these operators, although it does not uniquely determine their quantum forms due to operator ordering ambiguities. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexity and challenges in defining raising and lowering operators for anharmonic oscillators.
hilbert2
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,600
Reaction score
607
Let's say I have an anharmonic 1D oscillator that has the hamiltonian

##H=\frac{p^2}{2m}+\frac{1}{2}kx^2+\lambda x^4##

or some other hamiltonian with higher than second-order terms in the potential energy. Is it possible, in general, to find raising and lowering operators for such a system? I mean operators that commute with the hamiltonian in such a way that they transform an eigenstate of ##H## into another eigenstate that has a higher or lower eigenvalue (of course the eigenvalues will not be evenly spaced in the anharmonic situation). I remember reading an article where someone solved the Morse oscillator system with some kind of generalized raising and lowering operators, but for some reason I can't access the full text anymore.

How would I go about constructing an example of an oscillator hamiltonian that is anharmonic and for which the creation and annihilation operators can be found?

EDIT: Yes, of course such operators exist for any quantum system, but usually they are not a simple function of the x and p operators.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Action-Angle Variables

There is an approximate way to get raising and lowering operators for an arbitrary potential that uses the heuristic of the Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization rule. Unfortunately, it's only an approximation which is good in the semiclassical limit. I don't know how to systematically get better and better approximations.

The Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization rule is this:

First, using classical dynamics, you define the action variable J as follows:
J = \frac{1}{2 \pi}\int \sqrt{2m(E - V(x))} dx

This gives J as a function of E. If you invert this, to get E as a fuction of J, then you can define an angular frequency \omega via:

\omega = \dfrac{\partial E}{\partial J}

Finally, you create a new angle variable \theta to be just

\theta = \omega t

The pair \theta, J act as a generalized coordinate and corresponding momentum. In principle, you can figure out how to compute \theta, J from the usual coordinates x, p. The advantage to the \theta, J description is that the dynamics are particularly simple: the energy only depends on J, and so (by the hamilton equations of motion), the time dependence of \theta is trivial.

To relate this to quantum mechanics, Bohr and Sommerfeld proposed the quantization rule:

J = n \hbar

Since E can be computed from J, this gives you an indirect quantization of E.

The problem with this approach is that it's only an approximation. The rule J = n \hbar is only good in the limit where n \gg 1. For the harmonic oscillator, it gives E = n \hbar \omega rather than E = (n + 1/2) \hbar \omega

Anyway, action-angle variables gives a heuristic starting point for the raising and lowering operators a and a^\dagger:

a^\dagger = \sqrt{J} e^{i \theta}
a = e^{-i \theta} \sqrt{J}

Since J is the momentum canonical to \theta, we have the quantization rule [J, \theta] = -i \hbar. If |n\rangle is an eigenstate of J with eigenvalue n \hbar, then a^\dagger |n\rangle is an eigenstate with eigenvalue (n+1) \hbar.

So a^\dagger = \sqrt{J} e^{i \theta} and a = e^{-i \theta} \sqrt{J} a = e^{-i \theta} \sqrt{J} give starting points for raising and lowering operators for an arbitrary potential. However, knowing the classical forms of J and \theta as functions of p and x doesn't uniquely determine the quantum forms, because of operator ordering ambiguity (which can be thought of as the source of the 1/2 \hbar \omega error in the harmonic oscillator case).

Action-angle variables is a very rich subject in classical mechanics, although not a lot has been done with it in quantum mechanics, except in the old quantum theory.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K