Quantum Calculus: Fund. Theorem & Plank Time?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter duffbeerforme
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus Quantum
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between the fundamental theorem of calculus and quantum physics, specifically regarding the concept of time. It is established that while calculus traditionally treats time as a continuous variable, quantum mechanics introduces the notion of discrete time intervals, such as Planck time. However, the consensus is that this distinction does not fundamentally alter the application of calculus to real-world problems, as the limit definition allows for approaching zero without actually reaching it.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the fundamental theorem of calculus
  • Basic knowledge of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with the concept of limits in calculus
  • Awareness of Planck time and its significance in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Planck time on quantum mechanics
  • Explore the delta-epsilon definition of limits in calculus
  • Investigate the role of gravity in quantum field theory
  • Study the quantization of angular momentum and its mathematical foundations
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, mathematicians, and anyone interested in the intersection of calculus and quantum mechanics will benefit from this discussion.

duffbeerforme
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi, first post. I'm not a physics buff at all and this is probably an easy question to answer.
when looking at the fundamental theorem of calculus you take the limit as say t goes to zero (t being time). But does quantum physics say that t is not continuous.. something like a smallest time step such as plank time?.. and would this change calculus when dealing with real world problems?

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, t need not be time, and as far as calculus is concerned, it can be anything. In quantum mechanics time and space are usually treated as being continuous variables, and it is usually only when you throw gravity (or field theory) in the mix that you need to ask questions about discreteness of time.

Aside: In quantum mechanics, things are sometimes discrete and sometimes not. It's not fundamental to quantum mechanics, but rather the spaces on which the quantities are defined. For example, angles live on a compact space, and so angular momentum gets quantized. On the other hand, distances are unbounded and so these aren't quantized.

Back to your question. I don't know if this would really change real-world problems. The definition of a limit says that you never actually have to take t=0, but just "as close as you need to". That's sort of the heart of the delta-epsilon definition of the limit.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K