Quantum Computing: Superpositon of states problem

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of superposition in quantum computing, particularly focusing on the challenges of extracting information from a superposition of states without collapsing the wavefunction. Participants explore the implications of measurement and the probabilistic nature of quantum algorithms.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about how to extract information from a superposition without collapsing the wavefunction, noting that observing one state seems to eliminate the others.
  • Another participant asserts that while measurement collapses the wavefunction, it provides the desired answer, implying that the other states are irrelevant for the specific problem at hand.
  • A different viewpoint suggests that constructing quantum algorithms is challenging because they must be designed to effectively extract information from the superposition while managing the probabilities of different outcomes.
  • It is mentioned that the probabilistic nature of quantum algorithms, such as Grover's algorithm, requires multiple runs to achieve a satisfactory answer, as the final measurement collapses the wavefunction of several systems.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that measurement collapses the wavefunction and provides a specific answer, but there is no consensus on the implications of this process for extracting information or the challenges in constructing quantum algorithms.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of quantum measurement and the probabilistic outcomes of quantum algorithms, but does not resolve the underlying uncertainties regarding the extraction of information from superpositions.

joelio36
Messages
22
Reaction score
1
Hey, I'm learning about quantum computing for a project and I'm a bit stumped about a concept:

They say in quantum computing you can have the superpostion of all possible states, then perform an operation on that wavefunction, and thus have all possible states processed in one operation.

That sits fine with me, I get that, but what stumps me is how do you extract all that information without collapsing the wavefunction? Yes you have a superpostion of all the states you need, but as soon as you extract (read: observe) a state, don't all the others in the superpostion disappear?

By the way, I'm writing this to explain quantum computing to my peers, 3rd year Physics B.Sc students, so we aren't the brightest bunch!

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bump. Any chance of an input? I can't find anything online. Cheers.
 
Still nothing hey...
 
Yes, at the end you do measure the wavefunction and all the other states in the superposition disappear. But this measurement gives you the answer you want, so you don't care about the rest.
Remember, with quantum computing you want an answer to a specific problem like in classical computing. The last measurement that you do, which collapses the wavefunction, gives you this answer.
That's all.
 
I guess this is one of the reasons why constructing quantum algorithms is tough. It has to be clever enough to extract the information from the superposition.

Algorithms/operations might also collapse the wave function to the particular state that we desire with higher probability but there might be a chance of getting some other output. Then based on the probabilities we have to repeat the computation till we are satisfied.
 
Also, since you collapse the wave function at the end to get the answer, the answer is usually probabilistic like in Grover's algorithm, so you have to run it a couple of times (collapse the wave function of several systems) to get the right answer with high probability.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K