Quantum electrodynamics and the brain

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Susan Pockett's claim that consciousness is linked to the electromagnetic fields generated by the brain, suggesting that conscious experiences are spatially patterned electromagnetic fields. However, the majority of cognitive scientists reject this notion, viewing it as a fringe theory lacking scientific credibility. Notable figures like Bernard Baars emphasize that the electromagnetic theory of consciousness is not taken seriously within the scientific community, and discussions on this topic are discouraged in educational settings to maintain focus on established scientific principles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic fields and their properties
  • Familiarity with quantum electrodynamics principles
  • Knowledge of cognitive science and its methodologies
  • Awareness of the scientific discourse surrounding consciousness studies
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the electromagnetic theory of consciousness as discussed in The Journal of Consciousness Studies
  • Explore the criticisms of fringe theories in cognitive science
  • Investigate the role of quantum electrodynamics in neuroscience
  • Examine the scientific legitimacy of consciousness studies and its acceptance in the academic community
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in cognitive science, neuroscientists, and anyone interested in the intersection of consciousness and electromagnetic theory will benefit from this discussion.

Anne Ross
Messages
6
Reaction score
1
Susan Pocket claims that part of the electromagnetic field of the brain is consciousness and that conscious qualities such as a red car are spatially patterned electromagnetic fields. She also claims that the quantum spatial scale is irrelevant. Intuitively it seems to me Quantum electrodynamics must be involved. Comments please. Calculations welcome.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Then what's the fundamental way how that differs from the electromagnetic field of some inanimate object? Should we think that the EM forces keeping a piece of rock or iron together are also "conscious"?
 
Anne Ross said:
Susan Pocket claims...
That's "Pockett", not "Pocket", is it not? As citations go, that one is a bit vague - can you link to something more specific?

If I understand properly, you are not asking about Pockett's conjecture that consciousness is associated with electromagnetic activity in the brain (a speculative topic that we wouldn't allow here) but rather a simple physics question: is classical electrodynamics adequate for describing that activity?
 
Last edited:
We can't really help you here with this discussion as it is not mainstream ie most cognitive scientists do not take these theories seriously.

Objections[edit]
In a circa-2002 publication of The Journal of Consciousness Studies, the electromagnetic theory of consciousness faced an uphill battle for acceptance among cognitive scientists. Scientific study of consciousness has only recently begun to gain acceptance as a legitimate scientific discipline, and some think field theories like McFadden's are unscientific beliefs that threaten their hard-won legitimacy[citation needed].

"No serious researcher I know believes in an electromagnetic theory of consciousness,"[18] Bernard Baars wrote in an e-mail.[better source needed] Baars is a neurobiologist and co-editor of Consciousness & Cognition, another scientific journal in the field. "It's not really worth talking about scientifically,"[18] he was quoted as saying.
Consequently, by PF rules this is considered a fringe science area and we don't discuss these topics as they tend to confuse our STEM students and detract from our mission to help them.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_theories_of_consciousness

However, wikipedia has an article (see above link) with references that you can follow to continue your investigation into this area;

Thanks to all who have contributed here and to the original poster for asking the question. Closing the thread.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
519
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
10K