Quantum electrodynamics and the brain

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the relationship between quantum electrodynamics and consciousness, specifically exploring the idea that the electromagnetic fields of the brain may be linked to conscious experiences. The scope includes theoretical implications and speculative connections between physics and cognitive science.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Susan Pockett suggests that consciousness is part of the electromagnetic field of the brain, proposing that conscious qualities are spatially patterned electromagnetic fields.
  • Some participants question how this concept differs from the electromagnetic fields of inanimate objects, raising the issue of whether EM forces in non-living matter could also be considered "conscious."
  • There is a request for more specific citations regarding Pockett's claims, indicating a need for clarity and rigor in the discussion.
  • One participant notes that the inquiry may not align with mainstream cognitive science perspectives, suggesting that the theories presented are not widely accepted.
  • Historical context is provided, mentioning that the electromagnetic theory of consciousness has faced skepticism and is often regarded as fringe science within the scientific community.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity and relevance of the electromagnetic theory of consciousness, with some questioning its scientific merit while others explore its implications. No consensus is reached regarding the relationship between quantum electrodynamics and consciousness.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in acceptance of the electromagnetic theory of consciousness among cognitive scientists and the potential confusion it may cause for students in STEM fields. The speculative nature of the claims and the lack of mainstream support are noted.

Anne Ross
Messages
6
Reaction score
1
Susan Pocket claims that part of the electromagnetic field of the brain is consciousness and that conscious qualities such as a red car are spatially patterned electromagnetic fields. She also claims that the quantum spatial scale is irrelevant. Intuitively it seems to me Quantum electrodynamics must be involved. Comments please. Calculations welcome.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Then what's the fundamental way how that differs from the electromagnetic field of some inanimate object? Should we think that the EM forces keeping a piece of rock or iron together are also "conscious"?
 
Anne Ross said:
Susan Pocket claims...
That's "Pockett", not "Pocket", is it not? As citations go, that one is a bit vague - can you link to something more specific?

If I understand properly, you are not asking about Pockett's conjecture that consciousness is associated with electromagnetic activity in the brain (a speculative topic that we wouldn't allow here) but rather a simple physics question: is classical electrodynamics adequate for describing that activity?
 
Last edited:
We can't really help you here with this discussion as it is not mainstream ie most cognitive scientists do not take these theories seriously.

Objections[edit]
In a circa-2002 publication of The Journal of Consciousness Studies, the electromagnetic theory of consciousness faced an uphill battle for acceptance among cognitive scientists. Scientific study of consciousness has only recently begun to gain acceptance as a legitimate scientific discipline, and some think field theories like McFadden's are unscientific beliefs that threaten their hard-won legitimacy[citation needed].

"No serious researcher I know believes in an electromagnetic theory of consciousness,"[18] Bernard Baars wrote in an e-mail.[better source needed] Baars is a neurobiologist and co-editor of Consciousness & Cognition, another scientific journal in the field. "It's not really worth talking about scientifically,"[18] he was quoted as saying.
Consequently, by PF rules this is considered a fringe science area and we don't discuss these topics as they tend to confuse our STEM students and detract from our mission to help them.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_theories_of_consciousness

However, wikipedia has an article (see above link) with references that you can follow to continue your investigation into this area;

Thanks to all who have contributed here and to the original poster for asking the question. Closing the thread.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 91 ·
4
Replies
91
Views
9K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K