Quantum fluctuations within an electromagnetic field

Click For Summary
Quantum fluctuations in electromagnetic fields are often attributed to virtual particles, but some argue that these fluctuations do not require such particles for explanation. The discussion highlights that quantum fluctuations can be understood as statistical variations of operators rather than mysterious phenomena. Lattice quantum field theory (QFT) does not necessitate the concept of virtual particles, as effects like the Casimir force and spontaneous emission can be explained without them. The term "quantum fluctuations" may be used in both technical and popular contexts, leading to confusion about its implications. Ultimately, the nature of these fluctuations is more about statistical properties than observable phenomena.
J-eastwood
Messages
9
Reaction score
2
hello,

I was wondering what caused quantum fluctuations within an electromagnetic field as i recently accepted that there are no virtual particles what causes the energy to fluctuate. here the quantum fluctuations are said to be caused by virtual particles.

essentially I'm asking for an explanation of quantum fluctuations in regards to lattice QFT.

thank you, jonah
 
Physics news on Phys.org
J-eastwood said:
I was wondering what caused quantum fluctuations within an electromagnetic field as i recently accepted that there are no virtual particles what causes the energy to fluctuate. here the quantum fluctuations are said to be caused by virtual particles.essentially I'm asking for an explanation of quantum fluctuations in regards to lattice QFT.

I know of no effects that depends on fluctuations of the quantum vacuum so my answer is they are not needed so forget about them. That they are not needed explains why they don't have to appear in lattice theory.

The Casmir force and spontaneous emission don't require it.

Thanks
Bill
 
  • Like
Likes OCR
Quantum fluctuations are not caused at all. They are a popular buzzword for the statistical triviality that the variance of a random variable ##A## with zero mean is typically not zero - except that ##A## is now an operator such as (a smeared variant of) ##\phi(x)##. Some people therefore think that this deserves a much more mysterious name. (See also this post and its context.)

More precisely, there are two uses of the term; a technical one that means precisely what I wrote, and popular one that associates with the quantum fluctuation weird stuff with a temporal behavior that is not observable, and thus figures only in the minds of those who enjoy quantum mysticism. (For example, the vacuum is temporally completely inert, but the vacuum fluctuations of most fields are nonzero.)

This is explained in more depth in the section ''Does the vacuum fluctuate?'' in Chapter A8: Virtual particles and vacuum fluctuations of my theoretical physics FAQ and other articles of this chapter.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes bhobba
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
718