Quantum-mechanical three-state system

  • Thread starter Thread starter thecommexokid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    System
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a three-state quantum system representing a professor, defined as |{\rm{professor}}\rangle = \tfrac{7}{10} |{\rm{Bohr}}\rangle + \tfrac{7}{10} |{\rm{Dirac}}\rangle + \tfrac{\sqrt{2}}{10} |{\rm{student}}\rangle. A common misconception is addressed regarding the sum of amplitudes; while they can exceed 1, the probabilities derived from these amplitudes must sum to 1. The amplitude for measuring the professor as "Bohr" is \tfrac{7}{10}, leading to a probability of \tfrac{49}{100} for this outcome. After measurement, the professor's state collapses to |{\rm{Bohr}}\rangle, ensuring that a subsequent measurement will yield "Bohr" immediately after.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly state vectors and superposition.
  • Familiarity with quantum probability and the relationship between amplitudes and probabilities.
  • Knowledge of measurement postulates in quantum mechanics.
  • Basic grasp of linear algebra, specifically vector normalization.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study quantum mechanics measurement theory to understand state collapse and its implications.
  • Explore the concept of quantum superposition and its mathematical representation.
  • Learn about the role of amplitudes in quantum mechanics and how they relate to probabilities.
  • Investigate the implications of quantum state evolution over time and the Schrödinger equation.
USEFUL FOR

Students of quantum mechanics, physicists, and educators looking to deepen their understanding of quantum state systems and measurement theory.

thecommexokid
Messages
68
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



Suppose your quantum mechanics professor can be modeled as a three-state quantum system:
[tex]|{\rm{professor}}\rangle = \tfrac{7}{10} |{\rm{Bohr}}\rangle + \tfrac{7}{10} |{\rm{Dirac}}\rangle + \tfrac{\sqrt{2}}{10} |{\rm{student}}\rangle[/tex]
The three states have the usual properties: [itex]\langle\textrm{Bohr}|\textrm{Dirac}\rangle = \langle\textrm{Bohr}|\textrm{student}\rangle = \langle\textrm{Dirac}|\textrm{student}\rangle = 0[/itex] and
[itex]\langle\textrm{Bohr}|\textrm{Bohr}\rangle = \langle\textrm{Dirac}|\textrm{Dirac}\rangle = \langle\textrm{student}|\textrm{student}\rangle = 1[/itex].

(a) If I add up the coefficients, I get: [itex]\tfrac{7}{10}+\tfrac{7}{10}+\tfrac{\sqrt{2}}{10}=1.54.[/itex] A classmate says that quantum mechanical probabilities must add up to 1 so [itex]|\textrm{professor}\rangle[/itex] is not a quantum state. What's the flaw in that argument?

(b) If we take a "Bohr-meter" and measure the professor's "Bohr-ness" on any particular day, what do we find? What's the amplitude for the measurement result?

(c) What's the probability of finding [itex]|\textrm{professor}\rangle[/itex] "Bohr"?

(d) Finally, if we measure the professor to be "Bohr", in what state do we leave him? After we measure him to be "Bohr", what happens if we immediately ask again whether he's "Bohr"?

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



Here's what I think the answers are; but I'm not currently in a setting where I can ask anybody if I have them right/complete. I'd just like it if somebody could look over my work and/or provide additional insight I may be missing here.

(a) There's no rule about quantum mechanical amplitudes having to add up to anything — in fact, in general amplitudes can be imaginary, in which case there's no way they'd add up to 1. Quantum mechanical probabilities, equal to the square of the amplitudes, must sum to 1, and indeed they do here:
[tex]\left( \tfrac{7}{10} \right)^2 + \left( \tfrac{7}{10} \right)^2 + \left( \tfrac{\sqrt{2}}{10} \right)^2 = \tfrac{49}{100} + \tfrac{49}{100} + \tfrac{2}{100} = 1.[/tex]

(b) and (c) The amplitude to measure the professor to be "Bohr" is [itex]\frac{7}{10}[/itex]. However, after a measurement with the "Bohr-meter", we will only find him either to be 100% Bohr or 0% Bohr: [itex]\frac{49}{100}[/itex] of the time we will measure him to be "Bohr", and [itex]\frac{51}{100}[/itex] of the time, we will not.

(d) Immediately after measuring the professor to be "Bohr", he is no longer in his original state. Instead he is in the state
[tex]|{\rm{professor}}\rangle = 1|{\rm{Bohr}}\rangle + 0|{\rm{Dirac}}\rangle + 0|{\rm{student}}\rangle .[/tex]
So if we measure him again immediately, we will find him to be "Bohr". However, over time his state will evolve such that if we measure him again after some time has passed, it is no longer certain whether he will be "Bohr".
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bump?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K