Quantum Mechanics and Group Theory questions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the relationship between wavefunctions in quantum mechanics and U(1) transformations, particularly in the context of Berry's Phase and Dynamical Phase. Participants confirm that multiplying a wavefunction by a phase is equivalent to performing a U(1) transformation. They also explain that under the adiabatic approximation, if the Hamiltonian is periodic, the acquired geometrical phase represents a specific U(1) transformation that connects the initial and final wavefunctions. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding these concepts for a deeper grasp of quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Basic understanding of quantum mechanics concepts, including wavefunctions and phases.
  • Familiarity with Berry's Phase and Dynamical Phase.
  • Knowledge of group theory, specifically U(1) transformations.
  • Understanding of the adiabatic approximation in quantum systems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Griffiths' "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" for foundational concepts.
  • Research the mathematical formulation of U(1) transformations in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the implications of Berry's Phase in quantum systems and its applications.
  • Investigate the adiabatic theorem and its significance in quantum mechanics.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, particularly those studying wavefunctions, phases, and group theory. This discussion is beneficial for anyone looking to deepen their understanding of Berry's Phase and its mathematical underpinnings.

Nomajere
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello all. I am new here. I am in the last quarter of a 3 quarter sequence of undergrad quantum mechanics and I just had some conceptual questions (nothing pertaining to homework). We just recently covered Berry's Phase and the Dynamical Phase. Now I wanted to start with a more basic quantum mechanical question before moving to Berry's Phase:

When determining a wavefunction $$\psi$$ we can pretty much derive a wavefunction "up to" a phase, i.e $$\psi = A \left(functions\right) e^{i \chi}$$ Now, if I am understanding elementary group theory correctly, a U(1) transformation would be multiplying our initial function by a complex exponential with a phase. So, is the wavefunction I wrote "up to a phase" basically transformed by U(1)?

Okay, assuming what I first asked is legitimate, I wanted to ask about Berry and Dynamical Phases. Through the adiabatic approximation we can write $$\Psi_n\left(t\right) = \psi_n \left(t \right) e^{i \theta_n \left(t \right)} e^{i \gamma_n \left(t \right)} $$. My question here is if any of this may be similar or is a U(1) transformation, or is it not so because of the possible time dependence?

Relevant equations:
$$\theta_n \left(t \right) =-\frac{1}{\hbar} \int_{0}^{t} E_n\left(t'\right) dt'$$

$$\gamma_{n} \left(t \right) = i \int_{0}^{t} \langle \psi_m\left(t'\right) | \frac{\partial}{\partial t'} \psi_{m}\left(t' \right) \rangle dt'$$

Thank you all for your patience and help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure I'm understanding your two questions but I will try to do the best with my (not that extensive) knowledge of the matter

- Yes, multiplying by a phase is equivalent to doing a U(1) transformation.

- if the adiabatic approximation is valid and If the path is closed, meaning H(T)=H(t=0), then yes the acquired geometrical phase is a very specific U(1) transformation linking the psi(t=0) original vector to the psi(T) final vector. It is specific in the sense that it depend on the path traveled by the hamiltonian (or more generally the path traveled in the projective hilbert space).
 
andresB said:
I'm not sure I'm understanding your two questions but I will try to do the best with my (not that extensive) knowledge of the matter

- Yes, multiplying by a phase is equivalent to doing a U(1) transformation.

- if the adiabatic approximation is valid and If the path is closed, meaning H(T)=H(t=0), then yes the acquired geometrical phase is a very specific U(1) transformation linking the psi(t=0) original vector to the psi(T) final vector. It is specific in the sense that it depend on the path traveled by the hamiltonian (or more generally the path traveled in the projective hilbert space).

Thank you! That was basically what I was looking for. We are using Griffiths, which when it comes to showing me how to do quantum problems, is great. Conceptually, I am not too happy with it all the time.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K