Quantum Mechanics: Fundamental Question

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Domnu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fundamental
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the derivation of the equations \(E = \hbar \omega\) and \(p = \hbar k\) in quantum mechanics. A participant, with a strong mathematics background but limited physics knowledge, attempts to derive these equations but encounters a mistake related to the distinction between phase velocity and group velocity. The correct approach involves using the relativistic energy expression \(E = pc\) and the relation \(E^2 = p^2 c^2 + m^2 c^4\) for massless particles, leading to the conclusion that \(p = \hbar k\) is valid when \(m = 0\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave mechanics and quantum mechanics fundamentals
  • Familiarity with the concepts of phase velocity and group velocity
  • Knowledge of the relativistic energy-momentum relation
  • Mathematical proficiency in differential equations and linear algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the relativistic energy-momentum relation \(E^2 = p^2 c^2 + m^2 c^4\)
  • Learn about the differences between phase velocity and group velocity in wave mechanics
  • Explore the implications of de Broglie's hypothesis on wave-particle duality
  • Investigate the role of electromagnetic theory in deriving quantum mechanical equations
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and anyone interested in deepening their understanding of quantum mechanics and the mathematical foundations of wave-particle duality.

Domnu
Messages
176
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm extremely new to quantum mechanics (my only knowledge of quantum mechanics is that taught in physics C, ergo none, and a bit of wave mechanics... however I have a pretty strong mathematics background... diff-eqs + linear alg. + vector calc.), and was wondering as to how the derivation of

[tex] <br /> \[<br /> E = \hbar \omega \iff p = \hbar k<br /> \]<br /> [/tex]

worked. Here's my derivation, which seems encouraging, but could someone tell me where my derivation messed up?

[tex] <br /> \[<br /> E = \hbar \omega \iff \frac{1}{2} pv = \hbar \cdot 2 \pi f \iff <br /> \frac{1}{2} p= \hbar \cdot \frac{2\pi}{\lambda} \iff p = 2 \hbar k \neq \hbar k<br /> \]<br /> [/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem lies in the difference between phase velocity and group velocity. And neither of these equations are really derived, although they are "consistent". de Broglie did it from analogies between classical mechanics and Fermat's ideas about light.
 
Domnu said:
[tex] <br /> \[<br /> E = \hbar \omega \iff \frac{1}{2} pv = \hbar \cdot 2 \pi f \iff <br /> \frac{1}{2} p= \hbar \cdot \frac{2\pi}{\lambda} \iff p = 2 \hbar k \neq \hbar k<br /> \]<br /> [/tex]

You should use the relativistic expression for energy. For example, to verify the relation for a photon, use

[tex]E = pc[/tex].

This can be derived from electromagnetic theory, or from the relation

[tex]E^2 = p^2 c^2 + m^2 c^4[/tex]

by setting m = 0. If we put this in [tex]E = \hbar \omega[/tex], we get

[tex]pc = \hbar \omega = \hbar 2\pi f[/tex].

Since [tex]f\lambda = c[/tex], we get

[tex]p = \hbar \frac{2\pi}{\lambda} = \hbar k[/tex].
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K