• Support PF! Buy your school textbooks, materials and every day products via PF Here!

Quantum mechanics scattering problem

  • Thread starter Vuldoraq
  • Start date
Quantum mechanics scattering problem, Please help!

1. Homework Statement

Calculate the reflection and transmission probabilities for right-incident scattering from the potential
V(x) = V0 for x<0
V(x)= 0 for x>0.
at an energy E <V0. Find the probability density and the probability current density in the region x<0.
What can you say about where the reflection is taking place?


2. Homework Equations

Stationary Scrodinger Equation,

[tex]E\psi(x)=-\frac{h^{2}}{8\pi^{2}m}*\frac{\partial^{2}\psi}{\partial\psi^{2}}[/tex]

Probability density,

[tex]\rho(x)=\bar{\psi}\psi[/tex]

Probability current density,

[tex]J_{x}=\frac{ih}{2\pi\m}(\psi\frac{\partial\bar{\psi}}{\partial x}-\bar{\psi}\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial x})[/tex]

Transmission probability, [tex]T=\frac{J_{trans}}{J_{incident}}[/tex]

Reflection probabilty, [tex]R=\frac{J_{reflected}}{J_{incident}}[/tex]

Also T+R=1

3. The Attempt at a Solution

Hi, I have gone some way with this problem and I won't inculde all my calculations (although if you want to see them please just ask and I will post them). Lets start with my solutions to the schrodinger equation in both regions,

[tex]\phi(x)=Be^{-K_{1}X}[/tex] for x<0.

[tex]\phi(x)=Ce^{iK_{2}X}+De^{-iK{_2}X}[/tex] for x>0

where,
[tex]k_{1}=\frac{\sqrt{-2m(E-V_{0})}}{\frac{h}{2\pi}}[/tex]

and,
[tex]k_{2}=\frac{\sqrt{2mE}}{\frac{h}{2\pi}}[/tex]

Now I have that the wave with the B coefecient is the transmitted wave moving to the left and the wave with the C coefficient is the reflected wave moving to the right. The wave with the D coefficient is the right incident wave and is moving to the left.

Now if I calculate the probability current density for the transmitted wave I get zero, since the wave function is real. This means that the refelction probability must be 1. However this implies that no quantume tunneling can occur, which shouldn't be the case. Also it seems way too easy.

Please could someone check through my working and see where I have gone wrong? I have been pondering for ages but can't see the gap in my logic.
 
Last edited:
Please could someone help me? I am really stuck on this one and cannot see where I have gone wrong.

Thanks
 

TFM

1,026
0
Hi,

Firstly, your phi(x) for x<0 should have a i on the exponential.


This should change your values for the probability and probability density
 
Hi TFM,

Thankyou for replying I really appreciate it. Please could you explain why there should be an i on the exponential? Because if there is on that one surely there should be on the other term which we have disregarded, and if the other term has an i it's second differential will be negative, when it should be positive?

Thanks again!
 

TFM

1,026
0
Well I have:

[tex] k\phi(x) = \frac{\partial^2 \phi}{\partial x^2} [/tex]

[tex] \phi (x)= Ae^{ikx} + Be^{-ikx} [/tex]
 
Well I have:

[tex] k\phi(x) = \frac{\partial^2 \phi}{\partial x^2} [/tex]

[tex] \phi (x)= Ae^{ikx} + Be^{-ikx} [/tex]
If you differentiate the above twice you get -k^2 *A or B*phi(x). Thats why I'm confused.
 

Related Threads for: Quantum mechanics scattering problem

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Posted
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Posted
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Posted
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • Posted
Replies
2
Views
2K

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving
Top