RUTA
Science Advisor
- 1,509
- 552
atyy said:Actually, in my exchange with Physics Monkey, I think we were thinking the claim in the paper of the OP (not the Danan paper) is technically right but use of English is bizarre. I guess this might be the same as you saying about the Danan paper that the calculation is legit, but not necessarily the interpretation.
I think the quantum pigeonhole principle is false and their prediction for the outcome in the associated proposed experiment is wrong. Here is my analysis http://users.etown.edu/s/STUCKEYM/QuantPigeonhole.pdf.