Quantum Superposition Explained - Is It Possible?

Click For Summary
Quantum superposition involves a particle existing in multiple states simultaneously, but the idea of it vibrating faster than light lacks scientific basis. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding established principles before attempting to explain complex concepts like superposition. Speculative ideas without empirical support or specific predictions do not contribute meaningfully to scientific discourse. Engaging with existing literature and theories is crucial for a deeper comprehension of quantum mechanics. Overall, a solid foundation in the subject is necessary for meaningful contributions to the discussion on superposition.
Greg_Jones
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi...if you could spare a minute of your time?

I've had the novel idea to explain superpostion.Is it possible that it vibrates at faster than the speed of light or near the speed of light and is therefore essentially (there before it has left it's original position?) Therefore in two places at the same time? Also giving it mass?

Sorry to bother you :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Greg_Jones said:
Hi...if you could spare a minute of your time?

I've had the novel idea to explain superpostion.Is it possible that it vibrates at faster than the speed of light or near the speed of light and is therefore essentially (there before it has left it's original position?) Therefore in two places at the same time? Also giving it mass?

Sorry to bother you :)

Welcome to PhysicsForums, Greg!

Rather than starting off trying to "explain" something like superposition, you might want to learn a bit more first. Perhaps you could google it, and then ask some questions about it.

You will see here quickly that your explanation doesn't actually explain anything, as in providing new insight or a new formula to apply. That is the difficult side of science, as I could just as easily speculate that superposition is anything if I don't make any specific predictions.
 

Thread 'Two equivalent statements of time reversal symmetric Hamiltonian'

Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?
View full post »

Similar threads

High School Question about quantum superposition
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
High School How do I explain quantum superposition?
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Undergrad Superposition Analogy: Ceiling Fan Spin Beyond 15,000 RPM
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Undergrad What Are the Key Questions and Challenges in Understanding Quantum Gravity?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
High School The moment we observe superposition
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Undergrad Is it possible to explain Quantum tunneling with the HUP?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Undergrad Quantum decoherence superposition of macroscopic object
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
High School Quantum Entanglement: Explaining the Logic Behind It
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
6K
Undergrad Is it possible for a BBO crystal to produce an interference pattern?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Undergrad Quantum Coherence: Macroscopic Superpositions Explained
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K