Quark axial-vector current in nucleion

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Andrea M.
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Current Quark
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the parametrization of the matrix element of the quark axial-vector coupling in nucleons, specifically represented as $$\langle n|\bar q\gamma_\mu\gamma_5q|n\rangle=2s_\mu^{(n)}\Delta q^{(n)}$$. Here, ##\Delta q## denotes the fraction of the nucleon spin carried by quark ##q##, while ##s_\mu^{(n)}## represents the nucleon spin ##n##. A reference for the derivation and justification of this parametrization is found in Jaffe and Manohar's work, particularly in section VI. Additionally, a scanned PDF from KEK is available for further reading.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quark axial-vector coupling
  • Familiarity with nucleon spin dynamics
  • Knowledge of quantum field theory
  • Access to Jaffe and Manohar's research
NEXT STEPS
  • Review Jaffe and Manohar's section VI for detailed derivation
  • Examine the scanned PDF from KEK for supplementary information
  • Study the implications of quark spin contributions in nucleon interactions
  • Explore additional literature on supersymmetric dark matter detection
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, particularly those specializing in particle physics, quantum field theory, and dark matter research, as well as students seeking to deepen their understanding of quark dynamics in nucleons.

Andrea M.
Messages
27
Reaction score
1
In almost all direct detection articles (see for example Jungman, G., Kamionkowski, M. & Griest, K., 1996. Supersymmetric dark matter) I found the following parametrization for the matrix element of the quark axial-vector coupling:
$$
\langle n|\bar q\gamma_\mu\gamma_5q|n\rangle=2s_\mu^{(n)}\Delta q^{(n)}
$$
where ##\Delta q## is the fraction of the nucleon spin carried by quark ##q## and ##s_\mu^{(n)}## is the spin of the nucleon ##n##. Even if this make sense i would like to have a reference where find a derivation or a justification of this fact.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's a useful discussion in Jaffe and Manohar, particularly section VI. A scanned pdf file from KEK is available at the link.
 
Thank you, I'll check it out!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K