Can G-Parity Explain the Dominance of Vector Current in Tau Decay?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the calculation of the decay width for the process \(\tau \rightarrow \rho \; \nu_{\tau}\) using a parameterization of the matrix element of the hadronic current. The matrix element is expressed as \(\left<\rho |\; \bar{u} \gamma^{\mu} \left( 1-\gamma^{5} \right ) d \; | 0\right>\), which includes both vector and axial currents. The key conclusion is that only the vector current term survives due to G-parity considerations, as the vector current is even under G-parity transformations while the axial current is odd. This distinction is crucial for demonstrating the dominance of the vector current in tau decay.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of decay width calculations in particle physics
  • Familiarity with matrix elements in quantum field theory
  • Knowledge of G-parity and its implications for hadron classification
  • Basic concepts of vector and axial currents in particle interactions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of decay widths in particle physics, focusing on vector currents
  • Research G-parity transformations and their effects on particle interactions
  • Examine the role of axial currents in weak decays and their parity properties
  • Read "Quarks and Leptons" by Lev Okun for a deeper understanding of particle interactions
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for particle physicists, graduate students in theoretical physics, and researchers focusing on decay processes and quantum field theory.

GWSguy
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm studying the \tau \rightarrow \rho \; \nu_{\tau} decay. I'm asked to calculate the decay width, using a parameterization of the matrix element of the hadronic current. I actually find a matrix element of the form:
\left&lt;\rho |\; \bar{u} \gamma^{\mu} \left( 1-\gamma^{5} \right ) d \; | 0\right&gt;
in which I have both the vector and the axial current (u and d are up and down quarks). The \rho meson is a spin 1 vector meson, so I expect that only the term from the vector current survives. I've infact verified this statement in many articles which report:
\left&lt;\rho |\; \bar{u} \gamma^{\mu} d \; | 0\right&gt; = f_{\rho} m_{\rho} \epsilon ^{\mu}
with \epsilon ^{\mu} the polarization vector of the meson.

The problem is that I'm not able to demonstrate it. How can I formally demonstrate it? Is there any parity argument which allows me to exclude the axial term?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Last edited by a moderator:
I know understand! The vector current is even under a G-parity transformation. I recall that G-parity is a multiplicative quantum number used for hadrons classification. It is defined as a rotation about the 2-axis, followed by charge conjugation, i.e. C \mathrm{e}^{i\pi I_{2}} where I_{2} is an isospin generator. The \rho is even to. The axial current is odd under such a transformation.
For more details, I suggest Quarks and Leptons by Lev Okun.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
13K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K