Quasar is a huge source of energy

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Astro-Anouar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Quasar Source
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Quasars are immense sources of energy, significantly outshining entire galaxies due to their association with supermassive black holes. The energy produced by quasars originates from matter in an accretion disk, which heats up to extreme temperatures as it spirals into the black hole. Contrary to misconceptions, black holes cannot be "full"; they continuously draw in matter, increasing their energy output. Recent studies indicate that the energy output of quasars is less than previously estimated, as the emission is directed along the axis of the accretion disk rather than uniformly in all directions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of supermassive black holes
  • Knowledge of accretion disk dynamics
  • Familiarity with the concept of spacetime curvature
  • Basic principles of astrophysics and energy emission
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mechanics of accretion disks in astrophysics
  • Study the properties and behaviors of supermassive black holes
  • Explore the physics behind quasar emissions and energy output
  • Investigate the latest findings on black hole energy dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, students of physics, and anyone interested in the mechanisms of energy production in quasars and black holes.

Astro-Anouar
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
I know that the quasar is a huge source of energy, it can produce energy and light more that glaxies do ; so the question is how that can be possible and the quasar is a super massive Black hole which absorb every thing even Light couldn't escape ?! My Friend tell me when the Black Hole is Full of Matter and energy and it can't absorb any more, he start to produce energy , But I heard in a documentary that Black hole's Curvature of spacetime is infinity and I understand that the black hole can't be Full !
 
Space news on Phys.org
Your friend is way off. You're correct in that a black hole "can't be full" it just gets "hungrier" when fed.

The energy of the quasar comes from the matter before it falls into the black hole. Being drawn close to the hole it gets drawn into a smaller volume, much smaller, and heats up beyond white hot (actually x-ray hot). The emission of the quasar is this heat being radiated away. You can read about the details as predicted by the physics in lots of online sources at various levels of technical detail. Simply search QUASAR or "accretion disk".

A final note, the energy output of Quasars is now understood to be less than we originally thought given better understanding of the process details. The typical model is of the infalling matter in an orbital accretion disk with magnetic effects and the disk itself directing the energy out along the axis rather than in all directions. Thus the power output calculated by the brightness we see at this distance no longer assumes the same brightness in all directions. It is still huge beyond imagining relative to scales with which we are familiar.
 
jambaugh said:
Your friend is way off. You're correct in that a black hole "can't be full" it just gets "hungrier" when fed.

The energy of the quasar comes from the matter before it falls into the black hole. Being drawn close to the hole it gets drawn into a smaller volume, much smaller, and heats up beyond white hot (actually x-ray hot). The emission of the quasar is this heat being radiated away. You can read about the details as predicted by the physics in lots of online sources at various levels of technical detail. Simply search QUASAR or "accretion disk".

A final note, the energy output of Quasars is now understood to be less than we originally thought given better understanding of the process details. The typical model is of the infalling matter in an orbital accretion disk with magnetic effects and the disk itself directing the energy out along the axis rather than in all directions. Thus the power output calculated by the brightness we see at this distance no longer assumes the same brightness in all directions. It is still huge beyond imagining relative to scales with which we are familiar.

Thank You Very Much ! :biggrin:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 134 ·
5
Replies
134
Views
11K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
766
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K