Question about Braket notation

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter chemstudent09
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Braket notation Notation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the manipulation of bra-ket notation in quantum mechanics, specifically the expressions involving the Kronecker delta, denoted as S. The participants clarify that < r | i > equals S_ri, and correct a typo regarding the indices in the expressions. They explore the relationship between < r | i >< a | j > and < r | h | a >, concluding that the left-hand side represents a scalar while the right-hand side has dimensions of energy, indicating a fundamental mismatch. Ultimately, they derive that if |i> and |j> form a complete set of basis vectors, the expression simplifies to E[ - ] = - = 2*iota*Im( ).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of bra-ket notation in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with the Kronecker delta and its application
  • Knowledge of Hamiltonians and their role in quantum mechanics
  • Basic grasp of complex numbers and imaginary components
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Kronecker delta in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the implications of complete sets of basis vectors
  • Explore Hamiltonians and their significance in quantum systems
  • Investigate the role of imaginary components in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and researchers working with bra-ket notation and Hamiltonians will benefit from this discussion.

chemstudent09
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Ok, here is my question.

When you have < r | i >, this equals Sri. So logically if that is that case, if you had SriSaj this would equal < r | j >< a | j >, right?

If so, then what does < r | j ><a | j > equal? I'm working a problem where I am trying to get a final answer of < r | h | a >. Is that even possible from what I have here?

By the way, S = Kronecker delta.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In an orthonormal basis, yes, \left\langle {r}<br /> \mathrel{\left | {\vphantom {r i}}<br /> \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace}<br /> {i} \right\rangle = \delta _{ri}.

However, what you wrote, \delta _{ri} \delta _{aj} = \left\langle {r}<br /> \mathrel{\left | {\vphantom {r i}}<br /> \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace}<br /> {i} \right\rangle \left\langle {a}<br /> \mathrel{\left | {\vphantom {a j}}<br /> \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace}<br /> {j} \right\rangle is not true. I suspect a typo? Did you mean to put 'i' instead of the first 'j'?

EDIT: Ok until latex is back up, the first equation is <r|i> = S_ri. The second is S_ri*S_aj = <r|i><a|j>.
 
Yes sorry, that was a typo on my part. That first j was supposed to be an i.
 
Ok well, to answer your question, what you have with <r|j><a|j> is S_rj*S_aj.
 
Ok, now, is it possible for <r|i><a|j> = <r|h|a> ?
 
H is your Hamiltonian i assume? I can't imagine you'll get that manipulation ever if it is.
 
Last edited:
chemstudent09 said:
Ok, now, is it possible for <r|i><a|j> = <r|h|a> ?

Those don't have the same units. The left hand side is a pure number, and the right hand side has dimensions of energy.
 
Ok, I messed up in my problem. I have my problem worked down to this:

(I have to make E = Capital sigma (summation) because the LaTeX isn't working for some reason.)

E<i|h|j>[<r|i><a|j> - <r|j><a|i>]

(Sigma is summed over ij, I just don't know how to make it show on here)

Now is it possible for this to equal <r|h|a> ? In other words:

E<i|h|j>[<r|i><a|j> - <r|j><a|i>] = <r|h|a> ?
 
chemstudent09 said:
Ok, I messed up in my problem. I have my problem worked down to this:

(I have to make E = Capital sigma (summation) because the LaTeX isn't working for some reason.)

E<i|h|j>[<r|i><a|j> - <r|j><a|i>]

(Sigma is summed over ij, I just don't know how to make it show on here)

Now is it possible for this to equal <r|h|a> ? In other words:

E<i|h|j>[<r|i><a|j> - <r|j><a|i>] = <r|h|a> ?


Well, if |i> and |j> form a complete set of basis vectors (and i believe they do in this case), then the above expression reduces to this,
E<i|h|j>[<r|i><a|j> - <r|j><a|i>] = <r|h|a> - <a|h|r> = 2*iota*Im( <r|h|a> )
where Im() represents the imaginary part.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K