Question about element of and subset symbols

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter fishingspree2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Element Symbols
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the definitions and distinctions between the "element of" symbol (∈) and the "subset" symbol (⊆) in set theory. Participants explore the implications of these symbols when applied to sets, particularly in the context of the empty set.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that ∈ is used for elements of a set, while ⊆ is used for subsets, emphasizing that it is incorrect to interchange them.
  • One participant questions the use of the term "contains," suggesting it may introduce ambiguity without clear definitions.
  • Another participant clarifies that in naive set theory, a set can have sets as members, supporting the validity of both Ø ⊆ {Ø} and Ø ∈ {Ø}.
  • It is noted that in set theory, every element is itself a set, which may influence how these symbols are interpreted.
  • Some participants express confusion about the application of these symbols specifically regarding the empty set.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit disagreement regarding the interpretation and application of the symbols ∈ and ⊆, particularly in relation to the empty set. There is no consensus on the best way to express these relationships.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of precise language in set theory, pointing out that ambiguity can arise from terms like "contains." The discussion reflects varying interpretations of foundational concepts in set theory.

fishingspree2
Messages
138
Reaction score
0
Question about "element of" and "subset" symbols

I've always thought that ∈ is defined when talking about elements in a set. For example, if A is a set and x is an element, then x ∈ A is defined. It wouldn't make sense to say x \subseteq A

In the same way, if A and B are sets and A is contained in B, then it is incorrect to say A ∈ B. We should use A\subseteq B.

Question is: say a set which contains the empty set: {Ø}
I would think we should write Ø \subseteq {Ø} because Ø is a set itself.
But at the same time Ø ∈ {Ø} looks like it could also make sense... I am slightly confused.

Can anyone shed some light on the matter? Thank you very much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


fishingspree2 said:
Question is: say a set which contains the empty set: {Ø}

You go to the trouble of distinguishing between "element of" and "subset of" and then you use the ambiguous term "contains". Tisk, tisk.
 


Specifically, fishingspree2, you are being ambiguous when you say "if A and B are sets and A is contained in B" without distinguishing the two meanings of "contained in". In "naive set theory" it is perfectly possible to have a set whose members are sets. Given that \{\Phi\} is the set whose only member is the empty set, it is correct to say that the empty set is a member of that set. And, since the empty set is a subset of any set, both \Phi\subset \{\Phi\} and \Phi\in\{\Phi\} are both valid.
 


In set theory every element of a set is a set. There are no mathematical objects but sets in set theory.
 


fishingspree2 said:
I've always thought that ∈ is defined when talking about elements in a set. For example, if A is a set and x is an element, then x ∈ A is defined. It wouldn't make sense to say x \subseteq A

In the same way, if A and B are sets and A is contained in B, then it is incorrect to say A ∈ B. We should use A\subseteq B.

Question is: say a set which contains the empty set: {Ø}
I would think we should write Ø \subseteq {Ø} because Ø is a set itself.
But at the same time Ø ∈ {Ø} looks like it could also make sense... I am slightly confused.

Can anyone shed some light on the matter? Thank you very much.

Both are true, in the one case,
x \mbox{ is a set} \Rightarrow ( \emptyset \subseteq x)
and the other,
x \in \{ \emptyset \} \Leftrightarrow x = \emptyset.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K