Question about Milnor's topology fromthe diffable viewpoint

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter quasar987
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Topology
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Lemma 1 from a topology text, which asserts that the index of an isolated zero of a vector field in R^m remains invariant under a diffeomorphism. The lemma is proven by first simplifying the scenario to a small open ball around the zero, then addressing cases where the diffeomorphism preserves and reverses orientation. The key insight is that analyzing reflections suffices for understanding orientation-reversing diffeomorphisms, as they encapsulate the necessary properties for the proof.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector fields in R^m
  • Familiarity with diffeomorphisms and their properties
  • Knowledge of orientation in topology
  • Basic concepts of index theory in differential topology
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of diffeomorphisms in differential geometry
  • Explore the concept of vector field indices in more depth
  • Learn about reflections and their role in topology
  • Investigate the implications of orientation preservation in topology
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in topology and differential geometry, as well as students seeking to deepen their understanding of vector fields and diffeomorphisms.

quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32
Lemma 1 of page 35 says that the index at an isolated zero z of vector field v on an open set U of R^m is the same as the index at f(z) of the pushfoward f_*v = df o v o f^-1 of v by a diffeomorphism f:U-->U'. For the proof, he first reduces the problem to the case where z=f(z)=0 and is U a small open ball. Then he proves the lemma in the case where f preserves the orientation. Then he arrives to the case when f reverses it and says, "To consider diffeomorphisms which reverse orientation, it is sufficient to consider the special case of a reflection."

Why is this sufficient?!?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, got it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
8K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
11K