Question about non-relativistic limit of QFT

  • Thread starter guillefix
  • Start date
  • #1
77
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

In pages 41-42 of these notes: http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/tong/qft/two.pdf , it is said that [itex]|\vec{p}|\ll m[/itex] implies [itex]|\ddot{\tilde{\phi}}|\ll m|\dot{\tilde{\phi}}|[/itex]

Why is this so?
 
Last edited:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Avodyne
Science Advisor
1,396
87
Take a plane-wave solution of the KG equation,
[tex]\phi=\exp(i\vec p\cdot\vec x - i E t)[/tex]
where
[tex] E =\sqrt{\vec p^2+m^2}[/tex]
Now assume ##|\vec p|\ll m##. Then we have
[tex] E \simeq m + {\vec p^2\over 2m}[/tex]
and the solution can be written as
[tex]\phi=\exp(-imt)\tilde\phi[/tex]
where
[tex]\tilde\phi=\exp\bigl[i\vec p\cdot\vec x - i(\vec p^2\!/2m)t\bigr][/tex]
Now we can check that
[tex]\left|\ddot{\tilde\phi}\right|\ll m\left|\dot{\tilde\phi}\right|[/tex]
as claimed. This will also apply to superpositions of different plane waves, provided that only plane waves with ##|\vec p|\ll m## are included in the superposition.
 
  • #3
77
0
Thanks, and another question

Thanks for that! I've got another question though. In the same document, a bit later, he says that one can also derive the Schrodinger Lagrangian by taking the non-relativistic limit of the (complex?) scalar field Lagrangian. And for that he uses the condition [itex]\partial_{t} \Psi \ll m \Psi[/itex], which in fact I suppose he means [itex]|\partial_{t} \tilde{\Psi}| \ll |m \tilde{\Psi}|[/itex], otherwise I don't get it. In any case, starting with the Lagrangian:

[itex]\mathcal{L}=\partial^{\mu}\tilde{\psi} \partial_{\mu} \tilde{\psi}^{*} -m^{2}\tilde{\psi}\tilde{\psi}^{*}[/itex]

Using the inequationI think it's correct, I can only get to:

[itex]\mathcal{L}=-\nabla\tilde{\psi} \nabla \tilde{\psi}^{*} -m^{2}\tilde{\psi}\tilde{\psi}^{*}[/itex]

And from that I've tried relating [itex]\tilde{\psi}[/itex] or [itex]\psi[/itex] (as we can write the above Lagrangian with both, as it's invariant under multiplying by a pure phase), to [itex]\dot{\psi}[/itex]
 
Last edited:
  • #4
Avodyne
Science Advisor
1,396
87
Yes, start with the lagrangian for a complex field,
[tex]{\cal L}=\partial^\mu\psi^*\partial_\mu\psi-m^2\psi^*\psi[/tex] Let
[tex]\psi=e^{-imt}\tilde\psi[/tex] Then we have
[tex]\partial_t\psi=e^{-imt}(-im\tilde\psi+\partial_t\tilde\psi) \quad\hbox{and}\quad \partial_t\psi^*=e^{+imt}(+im\tilde\psi^*+\partial_t\tilde\psi^*)[/tex] Multiply these together, and drop the [itex]\partial_t\tilde\psi^*\partial_t\tilde\psi[/itex] term as "small", but do not drop the cross terms. If you like, then integrate by parts to move the time derivative off [itex]\tilde\psi^*[/itex] and onto [itex]\tilde\psi[/itex].
 
Last edited:

Related Threads on Question about non-relativistic limit of QFT

Replies
3
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
4K
Top