How Is Maximum Resistance Calculated in a Superconducting Ring Experiment?

  • Thread starter Thread starter andrew410
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuits
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the maximum resistance in a superconducting lead ring experiment, referencing historical data and specific parameters such as inductance and sensitivity. The subject area includes concepts from electromagnetism and circuit theory, particularly focusing on RL circuits and superconductivity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between current decay in an RL circuit and the maximum resistance, questioning the implications of sensitivity in the context of the experiment. They discuss different forms of equations and substitutions related to current and resistance.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing various equations and interpretations. Some participants are clarifying the correct substitutions and relationships between variables, while others are questioning the validity of derived equations and their units.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of specific constraints such as the sensitivity of the experiment being 1 part in 10^9, which influences the calculations. Participants are also addressing potential misunderstandings regarding the derivation of certain equations.

andrew410
Messages
59
Reaction score
0
The resistance of a superconductor. In an experiment carried out by S. C. Collins between 1955 and 1958, a current was maintained in a superconducting lead ring for 2.50 yr with no observed loss. If the inductance of the ring was 4.44*10^(-8) H, and the sensitivity of the experiment was 1 part in 10^9, what was the maximum resistance of the ring? (Suggestion: Treat this as a decaying current in an RL circuit, and recall that e^(-x) = 1-x for small x.)

I know that I = ((emf)/R)*(1-e^(-Rt/L)). How do I get the maximum resistance from this? Also, what does the sensitivity of the experiment mean?
Any help would be great! thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
use I(t) = I_0 e^{-Rt/L} instead, as the problem suggested, for small x, e^(-x) = 1-x
I(t) = I_0 (1-Rt/L))
I_0 - I(t) = Rt/L
the sensitivity is 1 part in 10^9 implies
\frac{I_0-I(t)}{I_0} < 10^{-9}
the rest is simple algebra
 
so,
R = \frac{L} {t}(1-\frac{I} {I_0})
and \frac{I} {I_0} < 10^{-9}.
Do I substitute \frac{I} {I_0} with 1^(-9)?
 
andrew410 said:
so,
R = \frac{L} {t}(1-\frac{I} {I_0})
and \frac{I} {I_0} < 10^{-9}.
Do I substitute \frac{I} {I_0} with 1^(-9)?

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
you substitute the whole \frac{I_0-I} {I_0} with 10^-9
 
wait a minute, where did R = \frac{L} {t}(1-\frac{I} {I_0}) came from?
The unit is not even correct... how did you get this?
 
I(t) = I_0 e^{-Rt/L}
I(t) = I_0 (1-Rt/L)
\frac{I(t)}{I_0} = 1-Rt/L
\frac{Rt} {L} = 1-\frac{I} {I_0}
R = \frac{L} {t}(1-\frac{I} {I_0})

am I wrong?
and then
\frac{I_0-I} {I_0}
simplifies to -\frac{I} {I_0} so -\frac{I} {I_0}<10^{-9}
 
Last edited:
oh yeah, you are right, my mistake
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
997
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
13K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
11K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K