Question about sig figs in buffer problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter vande060
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Buffer
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the preparation of a 1L, 0.1M acetate buffer at pH 5.22, using the equation pH = pK + log(base/acid). The professor's calculation suggests a ratio of 3 moles of acetate to 1 mole of acetic acid, but there is confusion regarding the treatment of significant figures, particularly why the 0.3 was ignored. Concerns are raised about the precision of pH measurements, as achieving an exact pH of 5.22 can be challenging in practice. Additionally, there is a critique of the concept of significant figures, suggesting they are not always reliable for accuracy in solution preparation. The discussion concludes that while significant figures can serve as a guideline, they should be approached with caution and an understanding of their limitations.
vande060
Messages
180
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



prepare 1L of a .1M acetate buffer with a pH of 5.22

Homework Equations



pK of acetate is 4.70

The Attempt at a Solution



this is what my professor did:

ph = pK + log(base/acid)

5.22 = 4.70 + log(base/acid)

antilog(.52) = (base/acid)

3 = (acetate/acetic acid) = 3.3/1

you therefore require 3 moles of acetate for every mole of acetic acid.
--------------------

I don't understand why the .3 was just ignored, it dosen't seem like she should have rounded down...any suggestions? I understand that eventually we will have to use .1M, which will reduce the sig figs to one, but that is not until the next step, and I thought you were not supposed to drop figures early.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't understand it either, especially if the question asks for pH 5.22 - that's quite specific (and difficult to prepare in the standard lab, 5.2 looks more reasonable; most pH meters are not able to reliably measure last digit, so you won't be even able to test it). I would go for 3.3.

Please note - sig figs are a faulty concept, something like "poor mans accuracy". Don't treat them too seriously, accuracy should be evaluated and reported using statistical methods. In the case of solution preparation they can be used as a rule of thumb, but even then you should be vigilant. If 1 means anything between 0.5 and 1.5, and 9 means anything between 8.5 and 9.5, the same one significant digit means about 50% error in the first case and about 5% error in the second case - so something is obviously wrong.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K